Re: s3c24xx kernel flavour

2010-06-16 Thread Thibaut Girka
Le mardi 08 juin 2010 à 14:15 +0100, Martin Michlmayr a écrit : > * Thibaut Girka [2010-06-08 11:31]: > > So, two questions: First, is it possible to have this flavour in Debian > > after some more work? If yes, can I target the 2.6.32 kernel so it have > > a chance to be in squeeze? > > I think

Re: s3c24xx kernel flavour

2010-06-15 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 14:02 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 11:31:41AM +0200, Thibaut Girka wrote: > > All those patches (except register-glamo.patch) comes from OpenMoko (OM) > > kernel.git, slightly modified to apply to the Debian kernel without > > needing all the changes m

Re: s3c24xx kernel flavour

2010-06-08 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 02:02:48PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 11:31:41AM +0200, Thibaut Girka wrote: > > X-Git-Url: > > http://git.openmoko.org/?p=kernel.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=470379585be3e2e116e9412e114698debb02eb9e > > MFD: pcf50633: Fix bitfield logic in interrupt

Re: s3c24xx kernel flavour

2010-06-08 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Thibaut Girka [2010-06-08 11:31]: > So, two questions: First, is it possible to have this flavour in Debian > after some more work? If yes, can I target the 2.6.32 kernel so it have > a chance to be in squeeze? I think the real question for now is: why are those patches not upstream and what ca

Re: s3c24xx kernel flavour

2010-06-08 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 11:31:41AM +0200, Thibaut Girka wrote: > All those patches (except register-glamo.patch) comes from OpenMoko (OM) > kernel.git, slightly modified to apply to the Debian kernel without > needing all the changes made by OM. Each patch should refer to the > correspondign commit