On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 02:04:52AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 09:47:45AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 08:41:52AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > > > 2. kernel-image-2.4.27-arm hasn't quite made it to testing yet either
> > > > > (should t
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 09:47:45AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 08:41:52AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > > 2. kernel-image-2.4.27-arm hasn't quite made it to testing yet either
> > > > (should today)
> > > > 3. the powerpc 2.4.27 kernel still isn't updated either,
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 08:41:52AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > 2. kernel-image-2.4.27-arm hasn't quite made it to testing yet either
> > > (should today)
> > > 3. the powerpc 2.4.27 kernel still isn't updated either, and is
> > > close to the point of not having an update included
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 08:41:52AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 05:45:45PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > Holes that do not effect the installer enough to require an immediate
> > > update can be dealt with more slowly, we can let the fixed kernel debs
> > > get enough testing
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 05:45:45PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > Holes that do not effect the installer enough to require an immediate
> > update can be dealt with more slowly, we can let the fixed kernel debs
> > get enough testing so we know they're solid before updating the
> > installer, and we can e
we will need to work
> with the security team to decide which kernel security DSAs warrant an
> update of the entire installer too.
Agreed.
> So with my thoughts on the background out of the way, here's my advice:
>
> Horms wrote:
> > The unfortunate problem is that the rc3
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 03:10:19PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> 3. the powerpc 2.4.27 kernel still isn't updated either, and is
> close to the point of not having an update included in rc3 at all.
Well, i am actively working on them since a few days, and they will be
uploaded at the latest this
ire installer too.
So with my thoughts on the background out of the way, here's my advice:
Horms wrote:
> The unfortunate problem is that the rc3 timeline meens if
> a new 2.4.27 is to go in, it needs to be uploaded ASAP.
> This in itself is a problem, because all the different ar
and apply don't always
work. Actually, I think that is pretty bad. Though most people
would probably never notice as they probably don't use patch and
unpatch enough for it to fall over - I only just noticed this week myself.
The unfortunate problem is that the rc3 timeline meens if
a new
9 matches
Mail list logo
