On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 12:55:30PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.22.1031 +0100]:
> > Ok, I want to have the latest kernel source installed,
> > so I install kernel-tree. Thats a reason.
>
> Please read the thread before you post. kernel-tree package
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> also sprach Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.22.1031 +0100]:
>> Ok, I want to have the latest kernel source installed,
>> so I install kernel-tree. Thats a reason.
>
> Please read the thread before you post. kernel-tree packages do not
> guarantee th
Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 12:11:24PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
>> also sprach Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.11.0823 +0100]:
>> > > > Sounds good to me, though I am slightly dubious about the last
>> > > > paragraph.
>> > >
>> > > Well, can you think of
also sprach Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.22.1031 +0100]:
> Ok, I want to have the latest kernel source installed,
> so I install kernel-tree. Thats a reason.
Please read the thread before you post. kernel-tree packages do not
guarantee the latest source to be installed because their
dependen
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 12:11:24PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.11.0823 +0100]:
> > > > Sounds good to me, though I am slightly dubious about the last
> > > > paragraph.
> > >
> > > Well, can you think of a use outside of the offfical archive?
> >
also sprach Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.11.0823 +0100]:
> > > Sounds good to me, though I am slightly dubious about the last
> > > paragraph.
> >
> > Well, can you think of a use outside of the offfical archive?
>
> I am just dubious that it needs to be mentioned
> as I could contrive a u
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 03:15:11AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.10.0249 +0100]:
> > >The package serves no purpose outside of the Debian build and
> > >archive infrastructure.
> >
> > Sounds good to me, though I am slightly dubious about th
also sprach dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.10.0235 +0100]:
> somewhere public, just never have). I just posted it in our wiki:
>
> http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianKernelTree
Much appreciated!
> http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianKernel
> http://wiki.debian.net/?Kernel
>
> Anyone know why
also sprach Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.10.0249 +0100]:
> >The package serves no purpose outside of the Debian build and
> >archive infrastructure.
>
> Sounds good to me, though I am slightly dubious about the last
> paragraph.
Well, can you think of a use outside of the offfical
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 02:35 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> Thanks for the doc, Dann.
>
> However, I think you will still agree with me that the control
> description for kernel-tree packages is largely false and
> misguiding. I propose the following instead:
>
> Description: Linux kernel sourc
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 02:15 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.10.0139 +0100]:
> > Here's a snippet of a doc I wrote for work some time ago - hopefully
> > others will jump in if there are inaccuracies.
>
> Ah, okay. So kernel-tree is really all b
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 02:35:52AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> Thanks for the doc, Dann.
>
> However, I think you will still agree with me that the control
> description for kernel-tree packages is largely false and
> misguiding. I propose the following instead:
>
> Description: Linux kerne
Thanks for the doc, Dann.
However, I think you will still agree with me that the control
description for kernel-tree packages is largely false and
misguiding. I propose the following instead:
Description: Linux kernel source tree for building Debian kernel images
This meta package is used as
also sprach dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.10.0139 +0100]:
> Here's a snippet of a doc I wrote for work some time ago - hopefully
> others will jump in if there are inaccuracies.
Ah, okay. So kernel-tree is really all behind the lines and
absolutely irrelevant to a non-developer, right?
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 00:24 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> I am wondering what the purpose of the kernel-tree packages is.
Here's a snippet of a doc I wrote for work some time ago - hopefully
others will jump in if there are inaccuracies.
kernel-tree & kernel-patch-debian
---
"It also contains the upstream changelog file."
right:
% dpkg -L kernel-tree-2.6.10 | grep -i changelog
/usr/share/doc/kernel-tree-2.6.10/changelog.Debian.gz
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debi
I am wondering what the purpose of the kernel-tree packages is.
First of all, I note the dependency line:
Package: kernel-tree-2.6.10
Version: 2.6.10-4
Depends: kernel-patch-debian-2.6.10 (= 2.6.10-4),
kernel-source-2.6.10 (= 2.6.10-1) | kernel-source-2.6.10 (= 2.6.10-2)
| kernel-
17 matches
Mail list logo
