Re: preferred solution for building kernel.deb and defining Entry point address

Am 13.07.2011 03:41, schrieb Ben Hutchings: On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 23:05 +0200, Marcus Osdoba wrote: Am 12.07.2011 01:43, schrieb Ben Hutchings: The commands on a recent amd64 Squeeze were: linux-src#>sudo make-kpkg --initrd --cross-compile powerpc-linux-gnu- --arch powerpc --append-to-version +

Re: preferred solution for building kernel.deb and defining Entry point address

On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 23:05 +0200, Marcus Osdoba wrote: > Am 12.07.2011 01:43, schrieb Ben Hutchings: > > Please explain exactly how you are building the kernel with a > > different entry point (config changes and commands). > Hi Ben, many thanks for the answer. > I'm working with the debian source

Re: preferred solution for building kernel.deb and defining Entry point address

Am 12.07.2011 01:43, schrieb Ben Hutchings: Please explain exactly how you are building the kernel with a different entry point (config changes and commands). Hi Ben, many thanks for the answer. I'm working with the debian sources on patchlevel 31 as base and applied the mikep5 patch [1]. I als

Re: preferred solution for building kernel.deb and defining Entry point address

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:59:01PM +0200, Marcus Osdoba wrote: > Hello Mailinglist, > > I recently experimented with building kernels based on squeeze's > patchlevel. The target (Wii, a powerpc flavor) is not that important > for the next question: > What is the currently preferred solution for bu

preferred solution for building kernel.deb and defining Entry point address

Hello Mailinglist, I recently experimented with building kernels based on squeeze's patchlevel. The target (Wii, a powerpc flavor) is not that important for the next question: What is the currently preferred solution for building kernel packages - make-kpkg or deb-pkg? The FAQ proposes make-