Hi,
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 11:18:28AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> If you have packages that are pending in NEW, please list them here.
There are no 2.6.10 kernel-packages left in NEW[1], thanks to a quick
processing after this thread started the other day.
> > with kernel-source-2.6.10 version 2.6.1
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 11:23:59AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 08:48:30AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 04:48:26PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 07:46:16AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:17:23PM +0900, Horms
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 09:06:51AM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:17:23PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > I would also like to have kernel-image-sparc-2.2, and
> > kernel-source-2.6.9 and its associated image and patch packages
> > removed. 2.6.9 is dead and 2.6.10 ha
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 09:13:27AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 09:06:51AM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:17:23PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > I would also like to have kernel-image-sparc-2.2, and
> > > kernel-source-2.6.9 and its ass
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 08:48:30AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 04:48:26PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 07:46:16AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:17:23PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I would also like to have
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 04:43:52AM -0500, Anthony Towns wrote:
> These packages should be removed/added now. If anything was missed /
> more needed to be done / other problems arise, please followup. Bug
> closed with this message.
Thanks, I think there might be a few more cobwebs/new packages o
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 01:56:09PM -0600, Jeffrey Austen wrote:
> The package kernel-patch-2.4.19-arm is still in testing and probably should
> be removed.
Thanks,
I have CCed the maintainer for his feedback.
I have also CCed the bug so it is logged there.
If you have any more information, pleas
The package kernel-patch-2.4.19-arm is still in testing and probably should
be removed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 09:06 +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
[...]
>
> > If you have
> > an architecture for which 2.6.10 is broken, now is your chance to
> > speak up.
>
> with kernel-source-2.6.10 version 2.6.10-5 amd64 SMP systems got broken.
> I am still investigating, it currently looks like
These packages should be removed/added now. If anything was missed /
more needed to be done / other problems arise, please followup. Bug
closed with this message.
Cheers,
aj
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 09:13:27AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> Well, you have to consider that the same guy going to remove the 2.6.9 kernels
> also has the power to do the NEW processing for the missing kernels.
your point =)
Kind regards
Frederik Schueler
--
ENOSIG
signature.asc
Descri
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 09:06:51AM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:17:23PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > I would also like to have kernel-image-sparc-2.2, and
> > kernel-source-2.6.9 and its associated image and patch packages
> > removed. 2.6.9 is dead and 2.6.10 ha
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:17:23PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> I would also like to have kernel-image-sparc-2.2, and
> kernel-source-2.6.9 and its associated image and patch packages
> removed. 2.6.9 is dead and 2.6.10 has replaced it.
Most kernel-image-2.6.10 packages (ppc, s390, hppa, alpha, amd6
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 04:48:26PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 07:46:16AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:17:23PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I would also like to have kernel-image-sparc-2.2, and
> > > kernel-source-2.6.9 and its associated
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 07:46:16AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:17:23PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would also like to have kernel-image-sparc-2.2, and
> > kernel-source-2.6.9 and its associated image and patch packages
> > removed. 2.6.9 is dead and 2.6.10 has
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:17:23PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would also like to have kernel-image-sparc-2.2, and
> kernel-source-2.6.9 and its associated image and patch packages
> removed. 2.6.9 is dead and 2.6.10 has replaced it. If you have
> an architecture for which 2.6.10 is broken, no
Hi,
I would also like to have kernel-image-sparc-2.2, and
kernel-source-2.6.9 and its associated image and patch packages
removed. 2.6.9 is dead and 2.6.10 has replaced it. If you have
an architecture for which 2.6.10 is broken, now is your chance to
speak up. Below is a list of packages that I no
17 matches
Mail list logo
