Hi all
I can now announce an "half official" statement from Kir
(who is the project manager of openvz) that they are now
dedicated to make a openvz. This is what he states:
-
Hi Ola, guys,
Thanks for the info. We have discussed this at length and
the resolution is we are all for it.
On Jan 25, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:26:42AM +, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > Actually I meant "vzctl exec" so this is not even close: I need to
> > change the context of a running process.
> Hu? "vzctl exec" does a fork and an exec. Please enlighten me where the
> support y
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 06:19:02PM +0100, Suno Ano wrote:
> As you can see from http://sunoano.pastebin.com/m4b5380dc , line 29,
> Cgroup memory controller is not. This setting is mandatory if you want
> to control the available memory per containers and the like.
It is not mandantory for the syst
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010, Suno Ano wrote:
> Bastian> Please describe the _kernel_ improvements over the normal
> Bastian> images. Most of it is already enabled in the default images
> Bastian> and does not warrant for an extra image.
>
> As you can see from http://sunoano.pastebin.com/m4b5380dc , l
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:26:42AM +, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Actually I meant "vzctl exec" so this is not even close: I need to
> change the context of a running process.
Hu? "vzctl exec" does a fork and an exec. Please enlighten me where the
support you want is actually implemented.
Bastian
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 24, maximilian attems wrote:
[]
>> On the negative side it doesn't have yet checkpointing support
>> and not all net/ has netns support yet.
> It's not just that, AFAIK there is no match for many of the
> user_beancounters features (especially the accounting part) and
In linux.debian.kernel maximilian attems wrote:
>On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 03:17:14PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> lack of the equivalent of "vzctl enter" is a critical issue for my
>> applications.
>looks feasable thanks to libvirt:
>virsh --connect lxc:/// console v1
>http://libvirt.org/drvlxc.h
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 03:17:14PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 24, maximilian attems wrote:
>
> > the plan as decided in Portland was to go forward with openvz
> > if upstream provides us with a patch in time. as currently this
> > looks quite bad (latest available patch is for 2.6.27, th
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 03:17:14PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> lack of the equivalent of "vzctl enter" is a critical issue for my
> applications.
looks feasable thanks to libvirt:
virsh --connect lxc:/// console v1
http://libvirt.org/drvlxc.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ..
In linux.debian.kernel Suno Ano wrote:
> Marco> So it will not actually be available in squeeze, and squeeze
> Marco> cannot work with the lenny kernels unless they are rebuilt with
> Marco> CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED=n. You could as well have said proposed
> Marco> to wait and use the RHEL6 kernels
On Sun, 2010-01-24 at 15:17 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 24, maximilian attems wrote:
>
> > the plan as decided in Portland was to go forward with openvz
> > if upstream provides us with a patch in time. as currently this
> > looks quite bad (latest available patch is for 2.6.27, there is
>> - Those environments in need for limits/beancounters (disk quota
>> etc.) May probably have to wait another six months or so until it
>> will be available in LXC. Till then it is quite possible to run on
>> 2.6.26 with OpenVZ and then migrate things to LXC.
Marco> So it will not actu
In linux.debian.kernel Suno Ano wrote:
> - most folks run Linux-VServer, OpenVZ, LXC etc. on boxes they own plus
> they control themselves so that is not really an issue
I wonder how you came to this conclusion.
> - those environments in need for limits/beancounters (disk quota etc.)
> may p
Bastian> Please describe the _kernel_ improvements over the normal
Bastian> images. Most of it is already enabled in the default images
Bastian> and does not warrant for an extra image.
As you can see from http://sunoano.pastebin.com/m4b5380dc , line 29,
Cgroup memory controller is not. This se
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 01:37:26PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> I thus propose to enable an lxc (linux containers) [1] flavour:
Please describe the _kernel_ improvements over the normal images. Most
of it is already enabled in the default images and does not warrant for
an extra image.
> * l
On Jan 24, maximilian attems wrote:
> the plan as decided in Portland was to go forward with openvz
> if upstream provides us with a patch in time. as currently this
> looks quite bad (latest available patch is for 2.6.27, there is
> no sign of a patch for 2.6.32, nor any schedule like it happene
hello,
the plan as decided in Portland was to go forward with openvz
if upstream provides us with a patch in time. as currently this
looks quite bad (latest available patch is for 2.6.27, there is
no sign of a patch for 2.6.32, nor any schedule like it happened
to be for Lenny).
I thus propose to
17 matches
Mail list logo
