Hi Ben,
On 18-08-2022 23:09, Ben Hutchings wrote:
For your info, s390x still fails:
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/s390x/l/linux/24628411/log.gz
Also for ppc64el.
I noticed right after sending.
These two are fixed by:
https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/commit/8d43
On Mon, 2022-08-15 at 22:15 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> On 01-08-2022 23:09, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Mon, 2022-08-01 at 22:53 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > > On 01-08-2022 22:46, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > Could you please allow this version to enter testing despite the test
> >
Hi Ben,
On 01-08-2022 23:09, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, 2022-08-01 at 22:53 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 01-08-2022 22:46, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Could you please allow this version to enter testing despite the test
failures?
If you promise to fix it in the next upload.
Yes, the fix is alr
On Mon, 2022-08-01 at 22:53 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> On 01-08-2022 22:46, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > linux 5.18.14-1 is currently blocked from migration due to a test
> > regression on some architectures.
> >
> > This is actually not a regression: there's a new test case, and it was
Hi Ben,
On 01-08-2022 22:46, Ben Hutchings wrote:
linux 5.18.14-1 is currently blocked from migration due to a test
regression on some architectures.
This is actually not a regression: there's a new test case, and it was
defined wrongly for architectures other than amd64 and arm64. That
should
linux 5.18.14-1 is currently blocked from migration due to a test
regression on some architectures.
This is actually not a regression: there's a new test case, and it was
defined wrongly for architectures other than amd64 and arm64. That
should be fixed with the next upload, but I'd rather not go
6 matches
Mail list logo
