Bug#649873: marked as done (linux-tools: how to create for a new kernel release)

Your message dated Sat, 10 Aug 2024 22:03:31 +0200 with message-id <17ba-4446-ff9f-1e8b-116657781...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#548021: linux-kbuild-2.6: needs building instructions has caused the Debian Bug report #548021, regarding linux-tools: how to create for a new

Bug#711108: linux-image-* should suggest linux-tools-*

Salvatore Bonaccorso : > I'm closing this bug now as I think it's not anymore relevant in this > outlined form. But please let me know if you disagree. Why do you believe so? Did anything change, other than renaming linux-tools to linu-perf?

Bug#793409: marked as done (linux-tools-4.0: "perf_4.0 script" cannot display userspace call stacks)

Your message dated Sun, 09 May 2021 05:13:06 -0700 (PDT) with message-id <6097d1d2.1c69fb81.d7b2a.d...@mx.google.com> and subject line Closing this bug (BTS maintenance for src:linux bugs) has caused the Debian Bug report #793409, regarding linux-tools-4.0: "perf_4.0 script"

Bug#661193: marked as done (linux-tools-3.2: perf fails to annotate code with separate debug info under some conditions)

Your message dated Sat, 1 May 2021 14:41:46 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#661193: linux-tools-3.2: perf fails to annotate code with separate debug info under some conditions has caused the Debian Bug report #661193, regarding linux-tools-3.2: perf fails to annotate code with

Bug#734945: marked as done (linux-tools: usbip - When using USB modem via usbip, the system hangs)

Your message dated Sat, 24 Apr 2021 12:13:17 -0700 (PDT) with message-id <60846dcd.1c69fb81.782ee.4...@mx.google.com> and subject line Closing this bug (BTS maintenance for src:linux bugs) has caused the Debian Bug report #734945, regarding linux-tools: usbip - When using USB modem via usbi

Re: Building perf tool and packaging it into linux-tools

On Wed, 2021-01-06 at 10:29 -0800, Ajoy Aswadhati wrote: > Hi Ritesh, > > Thank you for your prompt response. I am building kernel 5.10, for > Buster which is not the default version that is shipped. > If you can send me pointers on how to build the linux-perf package > that is part of the officia

Re: Building perf tool and packaging it into linux-tools

, 2021 at 11:17 PM Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > On Tue, 2021-01-05 at 15:07 -0800, Ajoy Aswadhati wrote: > > Hi Team, > > > > Can someone suggest the recommended way to build the "perf" tool and > > package it into linux-tools*? > > > > For the De

Re: Building perf tool and packaging it into linux-tools

On Tue, 2021-01-05 at 15:07 -0800, Ajoy Aswadhati wrote: > Hi Team, > > Can someone suggest the recommended way to build the "perf" tool and > package it into linux-tools*? > For the Debian shipped Linux kernel, there's the linux-perf package which will pull in the

Building perf tool and packaging it into linux-tools

Hi Team, Can someone suggest the recommended way to build the "perf" tool and package it into linux-tools*? I have been using a modified version (done internally at Uber) provided in this patch: https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2015/04/msg00013.html This patch doesn't ap

Bug#690770: marked as done (linux-tools-3.2: Please provide debugging package)

Your message dated Wed, 24 Apr 2019 14:43:40 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: linux-tools-3.2: Please provide debugging package has caused the Debian Bug report #690770, regarding linux-tools-3.2: Please provide debugging package to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processed: found 908547 in linux-tools/4.0.2-1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 908547 linux-tools/4.0.2-1 Bug #908547 [src:linux] linux-perf is missing dependencies generated by dh_perl and dh_python Marked as found in versions linux-tools/4.0.2-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if yo

"BPF API too old" with linux-tools 4.12.9

Any help would appreciated as linux-headers common are not built in reiser4 custom kernel build: make[7]: Leaving directory '/usr/src/build/kernel/build/linux/tools/build' /usr/bin/make FIXDEP=1 -f Makefile.perf make[7]: Entering directory '/usr/src/build/kernel/build/linux/to

Bug#778249: marked as done (linux-tools-3.16: Please include the x86_energy_perf_policy and turbostat tool on x86)

Your message dated Fri, 27 Jan 2017 21:00:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#778249: fixed in linux 4.9.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #778249, regarding linux-tools-3.16: Please include the x86_energy_perf_policy and turbostat tool on x86 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#702482: marked as done (linux-tools: please move /etc/bash_completion.d/perf to linux-base)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Sep 2016 00:08:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#702482: fixed in linux-base 4.5 has caused the Debian Bug report #702482, regarding linux-tools: please move /etc/bash_completion.d/perf to linux-base to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#837015: marked as done (linux-tools: FTBFS: util/event.c:448:2: error: 'readdir_r' is deprecated [-Werror=deprecated-declarations])

Your message dated Thu, 08 Sep 2016 09:53:20 +0100 with message-id <1473324800.2356049.719335057.6c28e...@webmail.messagingengine.com> and subject line Removed; see #837033 has caused the Debian Bug report #837015, regarding linux-tools: FTBFS: util/event.c:448:2: error: 're

Bug#837033: RM: linux-tools -- ROM; replaced by linux source package

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal All binary packages previously built by src:linux-tools have been taken over by src:linux (modulo changes to version numbers in their names). Please take care to only close bugs assigned to src:linux-tools (there should only be one, #837015) and not to the

Bug#837015: linux-tools: FTBFS: util/event.c:448:2: error: 'readdir_r' is deprecated [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]

Source: linux-tools Version: 4.4.6-1 Severity: serious Tags: stretch sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160906 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#816500: marked as done (linux-tools: should not migrate to testing before the corresponding src:linux)

Your message dated Thu, 14 Apr 2016 15:00:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#816500: fixed in linux 4.5.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #816500, regarding linux-tools: should not migrate to testing before the corresponding src:linux to be marked as done. This means that you

Re: RFC: Merging linux and linux-tools source packages

I've merged this change to the git master branch. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Larkinson's Law: All laws are basically false. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: RFC: Merging linux and linux-tools source packages

On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 05:02:28PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: ... > I am inclined to go ahead; does anyone have objections to this? Sounds to me like a good thing, thanks for this. I found it awkward to having to build the linux-tools orig tarball when adding linux-cpupower. On the other h

RFC: Merging linux and linux-tools source packages

minimal cross-toolchain and without the target's glibc development files.  In particular, the CI system at kernel-archive.buildserver.net used such minimal cross- toolchains. The source package was subsequently renamed to linux-tools as it was extended to build more userland tools from the k

[PATCH/sid v3.addendum] W: linux-tools source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends libcpupower-dev

From: Mattia Dongili --- debian/templates/control.main.in | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/debian/templates/control.main.in b/debian/templates/control.main.in index a64794b..3b93722 100644 --- a/debian/templates/control.main.in +++ b/debian/templates/control.ma

Bug#816500: linux-tools: should not migrate to testing before the corresponding src:linux

arch:all packages are  > installable on i386 and amd64. At the end of the britney run during  > which linux-tools migrated, the old binary packages from each of the  > other architectures were removed as doing so did not create any new  > uninstallability so far as britney was concerne

Processed: Re: Bug#816500: linux-tools: should not migrate to testing before the corresponding src:linux

Processing control commands: > tag -1 wontfix Bug #816500 [src:linux-tools] linux-tools: should not migrate to testing before the corresponding src:linux Added tag(s) wontfix. -- 816500: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=816500 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#816500: linux-tools: should not migrate to testing before the corresponding src:linux

On 2016-03-02 17:22, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 17:21 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 02/03/16 13:24, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 12:31 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > > Source: linux-tools > > Version: 4.4-4 > > Severity:

Bug#816500: linux-tools: should not migrate to testing before the corresponding src:linux

On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 17:21 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 02/03/16 13:24, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 12:31 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > > > Source: linux-tools > > > Version: 4.4-4 > > > Severity: important > > &g

Bug#816500: linux-tools: should not migrate to testing before the corresponding src:linux

On 02/03/16 13:24, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 12:31 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >> Source: linux-tools >> Version: 4.4-4 >> Severity: important >> >> Hi, >> >> new major upstream releases (e.g. 4.4) of src:linux and src:linux-tools

Bug#816500: linux-tools: should not migrate to testing before the corresponding src:linux

On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 12:31 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Source: linux-tools > Version: 4.4-4 > Severity: important > > Hi, > > new major upstream releases (e.g. 4.4) of src:linux and src:linux-tools  > should migrate together to testing. Right now src:linux-too

Bug#816500: linux-tools: should not migrate to testing before the corresponding src:linux

Source: linux-tools Version: 4.4-4 Severity: important Hi, new major upstream releases (e.g. 4.4) of src:linux and src:linux-tools should migrate together to testing. Right now src:linux-tools 4.4-4 is already in testing, which doesn't look too useful to me without src:linux 4.4.x-y. Doe

Processed: limit source to linux-tools, tagging 815593

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > limit source linux-tools Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'linux-tools' Limit currently set to 'source':'linux-tools' > tags 815593 + pending Bug #815593 [linux-kbuild

[RFC PATCH 0/2] Build cpupower packages from linux-tools

From: Mattia Dongili Better late than never I guess, I spent some time to make the necessary changes to linux-tools to build power/cpupower and package it in a way that can eventually take over cpufrequtils and libcpufreq. I really don't have a migration plan and I don't think I need

Bug#808329: marked as done (linux-tools: needs a rebuild for Perl 5.22)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Dec 2015 04:26:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#808329: fixed in linux-tools 4.3.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #808329, regarding linux-tools: needs a rebuild for Perl 5.22 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#808329: linux-tools: needs a rebuild for Perl 5.22

On Fri, 2015-12-18 at 18:58 +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: > Source: linux-tools > Version: 4.3.1-1 > Severity: serious > Control: block 796345 with -1 > > The linux-perf-4.3 package is currently uninstallable in sid because it > depends on libperl5.20 while we're switching

Bug#808329: linux-tools: needs a rebuild for Perl 5.22

Source: linux-tools Version: 4.3.1-1 Severity: serious Control: block 796345 with -1 The linux-perf-4.3 package is currently uninstallable in sid because it depends on libperl5.20 while we're switching to 5.22. The binNMUs scheduled by the release team failed with debian/bin/gencontr

Processed: linux-tools: needs a rebuild for Perl 5.22

Processing control commands: > block 796345 with -1 Bug #796345 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.22 796345 was blocked by: 787453 796923 790532 807038 799118 807423 807493 802939 807400 805391 787493 795127 804603 788073 804590 808325 787450 807478 807401 807324 787468 807422 807492 80747

Bug#807670: closed by Ben Hutchings (Re: Can't build linux-tools-4.2 package)

I just merge my debian and upstream branches to new branch. And then I successfully built from it. I think this is abnormal situation. Thanks for attention.

Bug#807670: closed by Ben Hutchings (Re: Can't build linux-tools-4.2 package)

building linux-tools package. It's ugly approach. No regards.

Bug#807670: marked as done (Can't build linux-tools-4.2 package)

Your message dated Sat, 12 Dec 2015 12:21:49 + with message-id <1449922909.3836.13.ca...@decadent.org.uk> and subject line Re: Can't build linux-tools-4.2 package has caused the Debian Bug report #807670, regarding Can't build linux-tools-4.2 package to be marked as done. Thi

Processed: Re: Bug#807670: Can't build linux-tools-4.2 package

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:linux-tools Bug #807670 [src:linux-tools-4.2-2] Can't build linux-tools-4.2 package Warning: Unknown package 'src:linux-tools-4.2-2' Bug reassigned from package 'src:linux-tools-4.2-2' to 'src:linux-tools'. No lo

Re: Bug#807670: Can't build linux-tools-4.2 package

Control: reassign -1 src:linux-tools On Vi, 11 dec 15, 17:07:29, Alexey wrote: > Package: linux-perf > Version: 4.2 > Source: linux-tools-4.2-2 > > > Hello! > When I try to build source package I got error. > > Command: dpkg-buildpackage -uc -us -nc -d -S -i -I

Bug#807142: jessie-pu: package linux-tools/3.16.7-ckt20-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu This version of linux-tools adds a new binary package (hyperv-daemons) containing programs built from the previously-unused tools/hv directory. This will improve support for

Bug#805949: marked as done (linux-tools: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (no binary artifacts))

Your message dated Tue, 24 Nov 2015 15:32:54 + with message-id <1448379174.27159.1.ca...@decadent.org.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#805949: linux-tools: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (no binary artifacts) has caused the Debian Bug report #805949, regarding linux-tools: FTBF

Bug#805949: linux-tools: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (no binary artifacts)

Package: src:linux-tools Version: 4.2-2 User: sanv...@debian.org Usertags: binary-indep Severity: important Dear maintainer: I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A" (i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed: ---

Processed: Re: Bug#661193: linux-tools-3.2: perf fails to annotate code with separate debug info under some conditions

Processing control commands: > found -1 linux-tools/4.2-2 Bug #661193 [linux-tools-3.2] linux-tools-3.2: perf fails to annotate code with separate debug info under some conditions Marked as found in versions linux-tools/4.2-2. > tags -1 + fixed-upstream Bug #661193 [linux-tools-3.2] linux

Bug#661193: linux-tools-3.2: perf fails to annotate code with separate debug info under some conditions

Control: found -1 linux-tools/4.2-2 Control: tags -1 + fixed-upstream On 2012-02-24 23:11 +0100, Sami Liedes wrote: > Package: linux-tools-3.2 > Version: 3.2.1-2 > Severity: normal > > Hi! > > perf report does not show source code lines (annotation) for some > bina

Bug#782761: linux-tools: Please include tools/hv daemons in a binary

Hi, On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 18:48:37 +0200 Christoph Martin wrote: > Since this is in HyperV since 2012 I consider it really important to get > into jessie main or at least officially working for kernel 3.16. It would be nice if we can push it to jessie point release. Then I'll try to ask MS folks

Bug#782761: linux-tools: Please include tools/hv daemons in a binary

On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 18:48 +0200, Christoph Martin wrote: > Hi Bastian, > > Am 17.08.2015 um 15:45 schrieb Bastian Blank: > > Hi Christoph > > > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 03:23:32PM +0200, Christoph Martin wrote: > > > do you see a way to get the tools/hv daemons into the 3.16 kernel for > > > j

Bug#782761: linux-tools: Please include tools/hv daemons in a binary

Hi Bastian, Am 17.08.2015 um 15:45 schrieb Bastian Blank: > Hi Christoph > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 03:23:32PM +0200, Christoph Martin wrote: >> do you see a way to get the tools/hv daemons into the 3.16 kernel for >> jessie in a point release? > > It will show up in backports. In backports wi

Bug#782761: linux-tools: Please include tools/hv daemons in a binary

Hi Christoph On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 03:23:32PM +0200, Christoph Martin wrote: > do you see a way to get the tools/hv daemons into the 3.16 kernel for > jessie in a point release? It will show up in backports. > There are a lot of jessie machines running inside HyperV which will need > it as soo

Bug#782761: linux-tools: Please include tools/hv daemons in a binary

Hi all, do you see a way to get the tools/hv daemons into the 3.16 kernel for jessie in a point release? There are a lot of jessie machines running inside HyperV which will need it as soon as the new backup method of HyperV servers is used. Yours Christoph Am 19.07.2015 um 04:08 schrieb Hideki

Bug#793409: linux-tools-4.0: "perf_4.0 script" cannot display userspace call stacks

Package: linux-tools-4.0 Version: 4.0.2-1 Severity: normal Dear maintainer, It seems "perf_4.0 script" cannot display userspace call stacks. Here's a simple program: ~~~c #include #include int main() { size_t size = 20*1024*1024; void* buffer = malloc(size); for (int i=

Bug#782761: linux-tools: Please include tools/hv daemons in a binary

On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 15:08:48 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote: > Sorry, try . Motonobu confirmed with i386 package works after reboot :) -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, em

Bug#782761: marked as done (linux-tools: Please include tools/hv daemons in a binary package)

Your message dated Thu, 16 Jul 2015 10:00:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#782761: fixed in linux-tools 4.1.2-1~exp1 has caused the Debian Bug report #782761, regarding linux-tools: Please include tools/hv daemons in a binary package to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#782761: linux-tools: Please include tools/hv daemons in a binary

On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 22:49 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 14:25:00 +0100 > Ben Hutchings wrote: > > This is not the version that was uploaded (as Bastian changed the > > service names). Please test the package that's now in > > experimental. > > Okay, I'll do, but can I get

Bug#782761: linux-tools: Please include tools/hv daemons in a binary

On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 14:25:00 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote: > This is not the version that was uploaded (as Bastian changed the > service names). Please test the package that's now in experimental. Okay, I'll do, but can I get it from experimental now? It seems to be still in NEW and I don't know

Bug#782761: linux-tools: Please include tools/hv daemons in a binary

On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 22:10 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, 28 Jun 2015 22:17:16 +0200 > Bastian Blank wrote: > > I commited an adopted version to our svn repo. Please test the > > changes > > and report back if it actually works. > > We've confirmed that Debian guest works well

Bug#782761: linux-tools: Please include tools/hv daemons in a binary

Hi, On Sun, 28 Jun 2015 22:17:16 +0200 Bastian Blank wrote: > I commited an adopted version to our svn repo. Please test the changes > and report back if it actually works. We've confirmed that Debian guest works well under Hyper-V host with this hyperv-daemons package thanks to Motonobu Taka

Bug#782761: linux-tools: Please include tools/hv daemons in a binary

Hi Hideki On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 04:17:25PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: > Then, Debian Kernel Team, could you apply and upload packages, please? I commited an adopted version to our svn repo. Please test the changes and report back if it actually works. Bastian -- ... bacteriological warfar

Bug#782761: linux-tools: Please include tools/hv daemons in a binary

Hi, On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 15:25:50 +0200 Christoph Martin wrote: > > Here's a updated patch. > > Could you test it, please? > > > > > > Thanks for the patch. It builds fine and the binary runs ok. Sounds good :) Then, Debian Kernel Team, could you apply and upload packages, please? It con

Bug#782761: linux-tools: Please include tools/hv daemons in a binary

un_2015_20_52_38_+0900_Wpq9207X8Y=nSOJ/ Content-Type: text/x-diff; name="linux-tools_hyperv-support.patch" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="linux-tools_hyperv-support.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit diff -Nru linux-tools-4.0.2/debian/README.Debian.hyperv-daem

Bug#782761: linux-tools: Please include tools/hv daemons in a binary package

Control: tags -1 +patch Hi, Here's a rough patch for hyperv daemons package (not tested yet) I'll try it later, but anyway for the record. -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane diff -Nru linux-tools-4.0.2/debian/buil

Processed: Re: linux-tools: Please include tools/hv daemons in a binary package

Processing control commands: > tags -1 +patch Bug #782761 [src:linux-tools] linux-tools: Please include tools/hv daemons in a binary package Added tag(s) patch. -- 782761: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=782761 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org w

Bug#711108: linux-image-* should suggest linux-tools-*

On Sat, 2015-05-16 at 09:50 +0200, Piotr Engelking wrote: > tags 711108 + patch > thanks > > Untested patch attached. > > It may also be interesting to notice that apt already attempts to > prevent automatic removal of linux-tools matching an installed kernel, > but f

Bug#711108: linux-image-* should suggest linux-tools-*

tags 711108 + patch thanks Untested patch attached. It may also be interesting to notice that apt already attempts to prevent automatic removal of linux-tools matching an installed kernel, but fails, since it assumes a version format which is no longer in use: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/apt-auto

Processed: Re: Bug#711108: linux-image-* should suggest linux-tools-*

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 711108 + patch Bug #711108 [src:linux] linux-image-* should suggest linux-tools-* Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 711108: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c

Bug#778588: marked as done (linux-tools: build fails with linux-3.19 sources)

Your message dated Mon, 11 May 2015 11:00:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#778588: fixed in linux-tools 4.0.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #778588, regarding linux-tools: build fails with linux-3.19 sources to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#726759: marked as done (linux-tools-3.11: uninstallable on jessie/sid (Depends: libperl5.14 (>= 5.14.2) but it is not installable))

Your message dated Mon, 11 May 2015 03:29:08 +0100 with message-id <1431311348.6033.10.ca...@decadent.org.uk> and subject line Re: linux-tools-3.11: uninstallable on jessie/sid (Depends: libperl5.14 (>= 5.14.2) but it is not installable) has caused the Debian Bug report #726759, regard

Bug#725075: marked as done (linux-tools-3.10: perf record -g option doesn't support "dwarf" method)

Your message dated Mon, 11 May 2015 03:31:08 +0100 with message-id <1431311468.6033.11.ca...@decadent.org.uk> and subject line Re: linux-tools-3.10: perf record -g option doesn't support "dwarf" method has caused the Debian Bug report #725075, regarding linux-tools-3.10:

Bug#782761: linux-tools: Please include tools/hv daemons in a binary package

Source: linux-tools Version: 3.16+63 Severity: normal the Linux kernel sources include in the tools/hv directory tools for using Linux in MS Hyper-V virtual machines. The tools include hv-fcopy-daemon, hv-kvp-daemon, hv-vss-daemon Especially hv-vss-daemon is needed to be able to use Hyper-V

[PATCH 4/4] RFC: builddeb: add linux-tools package with perf

From: Riku Voipio Perf is shipped in debian in linux-tools-$version package. Extend the existing to builddeb script to build perf if BUILD_TOOLS=y is added the make deb-pkg line Some features of this patch I'm uncomfortable with: 1. Relative paths are resoved to absolute ones Espec

Bug#778588: linux-tools: build fails with linux-3.19 sources

/HowToRebuildAnOfficialDebianKernelPackage but I encountered a couple of problems that break the build. Hoping that it can be useful, I am attaching the patch I diff'ed against the latest version of the repo: svn://svn.debian.org/kernel/dists/trunk/linux-tools The problems encountered are: - The

Bug#778249: linux-tools-3.16: Please include the x86_energy_perf_policy and turbostat tool on x86

Package: linux-tools-3.16 Version: 3.16-3 Severity: wishlist Hi, Would it be possible to include the x86_energy_perf_policy and turbostat tool on x86 builds of linux-tools? It allows you to set the x86 performance policy of the CPU, and a tool to monitor the CPU states of recent intel

Bug#771340: marked as done (linux-tools-3.16: perf not built for arm64)

Your message dated Tue, 03 Feb 2015 01:33:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#771340: fixed in linux-tools 3.16-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #771340, regarding linux-tools-3.16: perf not built for arm64 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#771340: marked as done (linux-tools-3.16: perf not built for arm64)

Your message dated Sun, 01 Feb 2015 11:00:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#771340: fixed in linux-tools 3.18.5-1~exp1 has caused the Debian Bug report #771340, regarding linux-tools-3.16: perf not built for arm64 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#771340: linux-tools-3.16: perf not built for arm64

On Sat, 2015-01-31 at 16:42 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 16:49:00 + Steve Capper > wrote: > > Package: linux-tools-3.16 > > Severity: important > > Tags: patch > > > > Dear Maintainer, > > > > For arm64, perf is not be

Bug#771340: linux-tools-3.16: perf not built for arm64

On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 16:49:00 + Steve Capper wrote: > Package: linux-tools-3.16 > Severity: important > Tags: patch > > Dear Maintainer, > > For arm64, perf is not being built for Jessie. > > I have attached a patch which works for me on a Juno board. > > A

Bug#771340: linux-tools-3.16: perf not built for arm64

Package: linux-tools-3.16 Severity: important Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, For arm64, perf is not being built for Jessie. I have attached a patch which works for me on a Juno board. A kernel patch is cherry-picked to fix a perf build bug (this only affects the arm64 tree). Also, I have

Bug#747151: marked as done (linux-tools: FTBFS: __u32 and __u64 shoud be used instead of u32 and u64)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Sep 2014 18:09:13 -0300 with message-id <5410bdf9.7090...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> and subject line linux-tools: error fixed for ppc64 and alpha with linux-tools 3.16-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #747151, regarding linux-tools: FTBFS: __u32 and __u64 shoud b

Bug#754213: closed by Ben Hutchings (Bug#754213: fixed in linux-tools 3.16-2)

Hi Ben, On 09/09/2014 09:51 AM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: #754213: linux-tools: build on ppc64el It has been closed by Ben Hutchings. Thanks /a lot/ for properly fixing this and providing that detailed explanation, it was very educational for me - really appreciated. The package has

Bug#754213: marked as done (linux-tools: build on ppc64el)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Sep 2014 12:49:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#754213: fixed in linux-tools 3.16-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #754213, regarding linux-tools: build on ppc64el to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#754213: marked as done (linux-tools: build on ppc64el)

Your message dated Mon, 08 Sep 2014 19:34:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#754213: fixed in linux-tools 3.16-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #754213, regarding linux-tools: build on ppc64el to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Processed: limit source to linux-tools, tagging 754213

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > limit source linux-tools Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'linux-tools' Limit currently set to 'source':'linux-tools' > tags 754213 + pending Bug #754213 [src:linux-to

Bug#754213: linux-tools: build on ppc64el

Package: src:linux-tools Version: 3.14-1 Tags: patch User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ppc64el Hi maintainers, The attached patch adds support for ppc64el in linux-tools. (I ommitted the output of the 'debian/control' target) Would you please consider it for an uploa

Bug#747151: linux-tools: FTBFS: __u32 and __u64 shoud be used instead of u32 and u64

Source: linux-tools Version: 3.14-1 Severity: important Tags: patch upstream Usertags: ppc64 alpha FTBFS on ppc64 and alpha of linux-tools is brought by using u32 and u64. http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=linux-tools&suite=sid http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/fetch.php

Bug#734945: linux-tools: usbip - When using USB modem via usbip, the system hangs

Package: linux-tools Version: 3.2.17-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, *** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? I've connected remote USB wireless modem via usbip and tried to set forwarding from LAN to PPP connection t

Bug#730883: marked as done (linux-tools: FTBFS: b-d on libiberty-dev instead of binutils-dev)

Your message dated Wed, 25 Dec 2013 12:49:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#730883: fixed in linux-tools 3.12.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #730883, regarding linux-tools: FTBFS: b-d on libiberty-dev instead of binutils-dev to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#730883: linux-tools: FTBFS: b-d on libiberty-dev instead of binutils-dev

Source: linux-tools Version: 3.11-3 Severity: serious Tags: jessie sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131128 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Due to the switch of libiberty to his

Bug#729197: marked as done (linux-tools: linux-headers-3.12-rc7-amd64 : Depends: linux-kbuild-3.12 but it is not installable)

Your message dated Mon, 18 Nov 2013 10:00:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#729197: fixed in linux-tools 3.12-1~exp1 has caused the Debian Bug report #729197, regarding linux-tools: linux-headers-3.12-rc7-amd64 : Depends: linux-kbuild-3.12 but it is not installable to be marked as

Bug#729197: linux-tools: linux-headers-3.12-rc7-amd64 : Depends: linux-kbuild-3.12 but it is not installable

Package: linux-tools Version: src:linux-tools Severity: wishlist when i try to install # apt-get -t experimental install linux-headers-3.12-rc7-amd64 linux- image-3.12-rc7-amd64 The following packages have unmet dependencies: linux-headers-3.12-rc7-amd64 : Depends: linux-kbuild-3.12 but it is

Bug#725075: linux-tools-3.10: perf record -g option doesn't support "dwarf" method

Yes, please update the package, the feature is really important for profiling! Thanks, Hannes -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/527d1d22.80...@mi.fu-be

Re: linux-tools and libunwind transition

On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 19:27 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 02:08:53 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > I recently (3.11-1) made linux-tools build-depend on libunwind8-dev, as > > the perf tool can optionally make use of this library. I didn't notice

Re: linux-tools and libunwind transition

On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 02:08:53 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > I recently (3.11-1) made linux-tools build-depend on libunwind8-dev, as > the perf tool can optionally make use of this library. I didn't notice > that libunwind was part of a transition or that it is only avail

Re: linux-tools and libunwind transition

tecture, it currently is and you must not block work on it. If ia64 will not be ignored for testing transitions then it looks like I have to remove the build-dependency from linux-tools - there's no way I can let the kernel wait for a full rebuild of ia64. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings [W]e found...t

linux-tools and libunwind transition

I recently (3.11-1) made linux-tools build-depend on libunwind8-dev, as the perf tool can optionally make use of this library. I didn't notice that libunwind was part of a transition or that it is only available on some architectures. In linux-tools 3.11-2 I added the necessary archite

Bug#726759: linux-tools-3.11: uninstallable on jessie/sid (Depends: libperl5.14 (>= 5.14.2) but it is not installable)

On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 02:38:11PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Package: linux-tools-3.11 > Version: 3.11~rc4-1~exp1 > Severity: normal > > 0 root@alice:~# apt-get install linux-tools-3.11 > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree > Reading s

Bug#726759: linux-tools-3.11: uninstallable on jessie/sid (Depends: libperl5.14 (>= 5.14.2) but it is not installable)

Package: linux-tools-3.11 Version: 3.11~rc4-1~exp1 Severity: normal 0 root@alice:~# apt-get install linux-tools-3.11 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an

Bug#725075: linux-tools-3.10: perf record -g option doesn't support "dwarf" method

Package: linux-tools-3.10 Version: 3.10-4 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, The "perf record" command "-g " option doesn't support a "dwarf" method in Debian. As the "dwarf" allows operating on programs which were compiled without a frame pointer

Bug#711108: linux-image-* should suggest linux-tools-*

Ben Hutchings wrote: > It might be a useful hint. However the linux-tools meta-package is > a more effective way to keep linux-tools-* up to date (unless you > install the kernel from experimental). Sure, I already use it, but, for an example, even though I do have the kernel poin

Bug#711108: linux-image-* should suggest linux-tools-*

On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 08:46:50PM +0200, Piotr Engelking wrote: > Source: linux > Severity: wishlist > > Please consider having the linux-image-${version}-* packages suggesting > the matching linux-tools-${version} package. This would help users to keep > them in sync. It migh

Bug#711108: linux-image-* should suggest linux-tools-*

Source: linux Severity: wishlist Please consider having the linux-image-${version}-* packages suggesting the matching linux-tools-${version} package. This would help users to keep them in sync. -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'te

  1   2   3   >