* Daniel Baumann [Thu, 17 Jul 2008 23:25:03 +0200]:
> in order to not
> block a possible .26 upload soon by waiting until a complying lmn
> migrated to testing, i'll upload .25 modules now, ask for whitelisting
> now so that it is in place for next time.
binNMUs need no ageing to migrate, but you
Adeodato Simó wrote:
> You could fix the problem forever instead, doing what Luk said.
as you maybe have read on -private, my forced vac due to military
service is approaching. i don't have the time to bet my money on the
chance that somebody will process the request in time. in order to not
block
* Daniel Baumann [Thu, 17 Jul 2008 23:16:54 +0200]:
> Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > However, it seems the package is not marked for building in the
> > experimental buildd network, so I can't schedule a binNMU.
> doing a sourceful upload then, thanks.
You could fix the problem forever instead, doing
Adeodato Simó wrote:
> However, it seems the package is not marked for building in the
> experimental buildd network, so I can't schedule a binNMU.
doing a sourceful upload then, thanks.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Int
* Daniel Baumann [Thu, 17 Jul 2008 23:01:32 +0200]:
> Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > Is it i386 only?
> since 'XS-Autobuild: yes' in control is not evaluated, yes.
That has no relation to it whatsoever. The binNMU is needed on i386 only
because it only depends on fglrx-source on i386.
However, it see
Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Adeodato Simó wrote:
>> Is it i386 only?
>
> since 'XS-Autobuild: yes' in control is not evaluated, yes.
You do have to send a request to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get that
changed as was announced on d-d-a which made you put that field in the
first place...
Cheers
Luk
--
Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Is it i386 only?
since 'XS-Autobuild: yes' in control is not evaluated, yes.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
* Daniel Baumann [Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:51:36 +0200]:
> Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > Could you ellaborate on what is the binNMU intended to achieve?
> see #490906.
Ok, you could have saved one roundtrip by mentioning it in your first
message.
And you could have saved one second roundtrip by including
Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Could you ellaborate on what is the binNMU intended to achieve?
see #490906.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
* Daniel Baumann [Tue, 15 Jul 2008 10:21:02 +0200]:
> please schedule binNMUs for linux-modules-nonfree-2.6 in order to get it
> in sync with the archive again.
Hm, it is not obvious to me what "getting it in sync with the archive"
means in this case.
Could you ellaborate on what is the binNMU i
Hi,
please schedule binNMUs for linux-modules-nonfree-2.6 in order to get it
in sync with the archive again.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-bauman
11 matches
Mail list logo
