Re: linux-2.6 stuck at 2.6.16-12 on i386 and amd64

2006-05-29 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Christian T. Steigies [Sat, 27 May 2006 11:33:41 +0200]: > Thats nice, but does it explain the buildds (sometimes?) don't pick up > packages? I had that with on of my own packages, amiga-fdisk. I did the last > upload in january, for m68k of course, and waited three months for the i386 > buildd

Re: linux-2.6 stuck at 2.6.16-12 on i386 and amd64

2006-05-29 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Florian Weimer [Sat, 27 May 2006 11:16:40 +0200]: > > Try http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html. It currently lists 3 versions > > and 10 architectures for linux-2.6. > Ah. And all these architectures include a new package, whereas your > powerpc upload doesn't? Strange. Bastian's -13 powerp

Re: linux-2.6 stuck at 2.6.16-12 on i386 and amd64

2006-05-27 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 10:51:55AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 10:20:06AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > It seems that the i386 and amd64 autobuilders do no longer upload > > their builds to unstable. What's going wrong? (2.6.16-14 hasn't been > > built on amd64 yet, bu

Re: linux-2.6 stuck at 2.6.16-12 on i386 and amd64

2006-05-27 Thread Florian Weimer
* Bastian Blank: > On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 10:20:06AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: >> It seems that the i386 and amd64 autobuilders do no longer upload >> their builds to unstable. What's going wrong? (2.6.16-14 hasn't been >> built on amd64 yet, but -13 has been, and it's not in unstable, >> eit

Re: linux-2.6 stuck at 2.6.16-12 on i386 and amd64

2006-05-27 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 10:20:06AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > It seems that the i386 and amd64 autobuilders do no longer upload > their builds to unstable. What's going wrong? (2.6.16-14 hasn't been > built on amd64 yet, but -13 has been, and it's not in unstable, > either.) Try http://ftp-ma

linux-2.6 stuck at 2.6.16-12 on i386 and amd64

2006-05-27 Thread Florian Weimer
It seems that the i386 and amd64 autobuilders do no longer upload their builds to unstable. What's going wrong? (2.6.16-14 hasn't been built on amd64 yet, but -13 has been, and it's not in unstable, either.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?