Matthias Klose a écrit :
Steve Langasek writes:
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 11:06:21PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
A few weeks ago, the 2.4 kernels have been declared "deprecated" [1]. I
would like to know what does this exactly mean:
- That users are advised not to use them?
- That we could dr
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 10:44:26AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> - configure gcc with --disable-tls (on which architectures would that
> be (not) needed?)
amd64, maybe hppa. Anything with supports tla in sarge and don't ship
with 2.4 kernels.
> - build a libstdc++6 with a gcc, configured with
Steve Langasek writes:
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 11:06:21PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> > A few weeks ago, the 2.4 kernels have been declared "deprecated" [1]. I
> > would like to know what does this exactly mean:
> > - That users are advised not to use them?
> > - That we could drop support
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 11:06:21PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> A few weeks ago, the 2.4 kernels have been declared "deprecated" [1]. I
> would like to know what does this exactly mean:
> - That users are advised not to use them?
> - That we could drop support for them in other packages?
> - Tha
Hi all,
A few weeks ago, the 2.4 kernels have been declared "deprecated" [1]. I
would like to know what does this exactly mean:
- That users are advised not to use them?
- That we could drop support for them in other packages?
- That they will be removed from the archive soon?
Bye,
Aurelien
[1]
5 matches
Mail list logo
