On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 10:18:12AM -0700, Julia Kartseva wrote:
>
>
> On 3/10/20 7:57 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 03:18:12PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >
> > so I did some more checking and libbpf is automatically pulled into
> > centos 8, it's just at the moment there's some
On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 03:18:12PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 04:22:35PM -0800, Julia Kartseva wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 12/20/19 5:58 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 09:37:23PM +, Julia Kartseva wrote:
> > >> Hi Jiri,
> > >>
> > >> 1. v. 0.0.6 is out [1]
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 04:22:35PM -0800, Julia Kartseva wrote:
>
>
> On 12/20/19 5:58 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 09:37:23PM +, Julia Kartseva wrote:
> >> Hi Jiri,
> >>
> >> 1. v. 0.0.6 is out [1], could you please package it?
> >> 2. we might need a small spec update du
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 09:37:23PM +, Julia Kartseva wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
>
> 1. v. 0.0.6 is out [1], could you please package it?
> 2. we might need a small spec update due to zlib is made an explicit
> dependency in [2]. zlib should be listed in BuildRequires: section of the
> spec so it's cons
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 09:14:19PM +, Julia Kartseva wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
>
> systemd folks published libbpf CentOS 7 package in systemd corp repo: [1],
> so guess that proves that deps from other repo are fine.
yea, actualy got request for that:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=176
Hi Jiri,
systemd folks published libbpf CentOS 7 package in systemd corp repo: [1],
so guess that proves that deps from other repo are fine.
Rebuild is fairly simple: [2]
[1]
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mrc0mmand/systemd-centos-ci/build/1053694/
[2] https://github.com/systemd/system
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 12:25:51AM +, Julia Kartseva wrote:
> On 9/30/19, 4:13 AM, "Jiri Olsa" wrote:
>
> > heya,
> > FYI we got it through.. there's libbpf-0.0.3 available on fedora 30/31/32
> > I'll update to 0.0.5 version as soon as there's the v0.0.5 tag available
> >
> > jirka
>
> Hi Ji
On 9/30/19, 4:13 AM, "Jiri Olsa" wrote:
> heya,
> FYI we got it through.. there's libbpf-0.0.3 available on fedora 30/31/32
> I'll update to 0.0.5 version as soon as there's the v0.0.5 tag available
>
> jirka
Hi Jiri,
I wonder what are the steps to make libbpf available for CentOS {7|8} as well
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 09:24:21AM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 4:10 AM Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 12:50:08AM +, Julia Kartseva wrote:
> > > Hi Jiri,
> > >
> > > v0.0.5 is out: [1] which brings questions regarding further maintenance
> > > of rpm
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 4:10 AM Jiri Olsa wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 12:50:08AM +, Julia Kartseva wrote:
> > Hi Jiri,
> >
> > v0.0.5 is out: [1] which brings questions regarding further maintenance
> > of rpm.
> > Who'll maintain the most recent version of rpm up-to-date?
>
> I will do
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 12:50:08AM +, Julia Kartseva wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
>
> v0.0.5 is out: [1] which brings questions regarding further maintenance
> of rpm.
> Who'll maintain the most recent version of rpm up-to-date?
I will do that on fedora/rhel side now
> Are you looking into making t
Hi Jiri,
v0.0.5 is out: [1] which brings questions regarding further maintenance
of rpm.
Who'll maintain the most recent version of rpm up-to-date?
Are you looking into making the procedure automated and do you need any
help from the side of libbpf devs if so? In particular, we can have the *
Thank you Jiri, that's great news.
Adding Marco D'Itri.
Marco, I wonder if you are OK with the rationale for libbpf packaging
from GH mirror? Can we proceed with switching Debian package as well
just like we discussed offline at ASG?
The bug report for Fedora: [1]
Thank you
[1] https://bugzilla.r
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 09:12:37AM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 10:30:24PM +, Julia Kartseva wrote:
> > On 8/25/19, 11:42 PM, "Jiri Olsa" wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 04:00:01PM +, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Technically we can bump it at an
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 10:30:24PM +, Julia Kartseva wrote:
> On 8/25/19, 11:42 PM, "Jiri Olsa" wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 04:00:01PM +, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > >
> > > Technically we can bump it at any time.
> > > The goal was to bump it only when new kernel is released
On 8/25/19, 11:42 PM, "Jiri Olsa" wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 04:00:01PM +, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> >
> > Technically we can bump it at any time.
> > The goal was to bump it only when new kernel is released
> > to capture a collection of new APIs in a given 0.0.X release.
> > So tha
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 04:00:01PM +, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On 8/23/19 2:22 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > btw, the libbpf GH repo tag v0.0.4 has 0.0.3 version set in Makefile:
> >
> >VERSION = 0
> >PATCHLEVEL = 0
> >EXTRAVERSION = 3
> >
> > current code takes version from libbpf.
On 8/23/19 2:22 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> btw, the libbpf GH repo tag v0.0.4 has 0.0.3 version set in Makefile:
>
>VERSION = 0
>PATCHLEVEL = 0
>EXTRAVERSION = 3
>
> current code takes version from libbpf.map so it's fine,
> but would be great to start from 0.0.5 so we don't need to
> bot
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 11:09:06PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:27:23PM +, Julia Kartseva wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 8/19/19, 11:08 AM, "Julia Kartseva" wrote:
> >
> > On 8/13/19, 11:24 AM, "Andrii Nakryiko"
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 5
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:27:23PM +, Julia Kartseva wrote:
>
>
> On 8/19/19, 11:08 AM, "Julia Kartseva" wrote:
>
> On 8/13/19, 11:24 AM, "Andrii Nakryiko" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 5:26 AM Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 07:04:1
On 8/19/19, 11:08 AM, "Julia Kartseva" wrote:
On 8/13/19, 11:24 AM, "Andrii Nakryiko" wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 5:26 AM Jiri Olsa wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 07:04:12PM +, Julia Kartseva wrote:
> > I would like to bring up libbpf publi
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 7:14 AM Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>
> On 8/13/19 2:24 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 07:04:12PM +, Julia Kartseva wrote:
> >> I would like to bring up libbpf publishing discussion started at [1].
> >> The present state of things is that libbpf is built fr
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 5:26 AM Jiri Olsa wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 07:04:12PM +, Julia Kartseva wrote:
> > I would like to bring up libbpf publishing discussion started at [1].
> > The present state of things is that libbpf is built from kernel tree, e.g.
> > [2]
> > For Debian and
On 8/13/19 2:24 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 07:04:12PM +, Julia Kartseva wrote:
I would like to bring up libbpf publishing discussion started at [1].
The present state of things is that libbpf is built from kernel tree, e.g. [2]
For Debian and [3] for Fedora whereas the bett
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 07:04:12PM +, Julia Kartseva wrote:
> I would like to bring up libbpf publishing discussion started at [1].
> The present state of things is that libbpf is built from kernel tree, e.g. [2]
> For Debian and [3] for Fedora whereas the better way would be having a
> package
I would like to bring up libbpf publishing discussion started at [1].
The present state of things is that libbpf is built from kernel tree, e.g. [2]
For Debian and [3] for Fedora whereas the better way would be having a
package built from github mirror. The advantages of the latter:
- Consistent, A
26 matches
Mail list logo
