server DS25
(Package: kernel-package)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have n
I have a simple request for the maintainer of the Linux kernel package for
arm64 architecture.
Please include a module with a VIRTIO sound driver.
The config file for the 6.1.0-23 kernel contains the following line:
# CONFIG_SND_VIRTIO is not set
Please change it to:
CONFIG_SND_VIRTIO=m
I
Hey Diederik and Bastian
On Thu, 2022-11-10 at 13:07 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Those symlinks are included in linux-headers-6.0.0-3-amd64, see
> https://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/linux-headers-6.0.0-3-amd64/filelist
>
> Did you remove that package as well?
You are both right, I have lin
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 03:37:16AM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> l 6.0.0-3-amd64/build 6.0.0-3-amd64/source
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 calestyo calestyo 36 Nov 5 14:41 6.0.0-3-amd64/build ->
> /usr/src/linux-headers-6.0.0-3-amd64
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 calestyo calestyo 37 Nov 5 14:41 6.0.0-3-amd64/sourc
On donderdag 10 november 2022 03:42:36 CET Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-11-10 at 03:37 +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> > $ ls -al 6.0.0-3-amd64/build 6.0.0-3-amd64/source
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 calestyo calestyo 36 Nov 5 14:41 6.0.0-3-amd64/build ->
> > /usr/src/linux-headers-
Just noted, that part of what I wrote is probably bollocks. ^^
On Thu, 2022-11-10 at 03:37 +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> $ ls -al 6.0.0-3-amd64/build 6.0.0-3-amd64/source
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 calestyo calestyo 36 Nov 5 14:41 6.0.0-3-amd64/build ->
> /usr/src/linux-headers-6.0.0-3-amd64
> l
Source: linux
Version: 6.0.7-1
Severity: normal
Hey.
When I tried out some recent patch from the intel folks for i915,
I built a custom kernel as described in:
https://kernel-team.pages.debian.net/kernel-handbook/ch-common-tasks.html#s-common-official
Now before I installed the custom built de
ule (uses
> snd-usb-line6), the machine running stock kernel package 4.9.0-9.
>
> Inspecting the source, it appears the message buffers are still coming from
> the stack as of this kernel package. Applying Ben Hutchings' patches as of
> message:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #852749 [src:linux] linux-image-4.9.0-1-amd64: usb-audio-device not working
since kernel 4.9.0.1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
852749: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=852749
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.
Your message dated Sat, 24 Apr 2021 05:26:25 -0700 (PDT)
with message-id <60840e71.1c69fb81.8103.7...@mx.google.com>
and subject line Closing this bug (BTS maintenance for src:linux bugs)
has caused the Debian Bug report #856999,
regarding kernel-package: does not compile Documentation/cdrom
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 Please enable CONFIG_IOSCHED_BFQ=y
Bug #946791 [linux] io.weight cannot be enabled in recent Debian kernel package
Changed Bug title to 'Please enable CONFIG_IOSCHED_BFQ=y' from 'io.weight
cannot be enabled in recent Debian kernel pac
Control: retitle -1 Please enable CONFIG_IOSCHED_BFQ=y
On Thu, 26 Dec 2019 23:17:13 +0900 Ryutaroh Matsumoto
wrote:
> Source: linux
> Followup-For: Bug #946791
> Control: tags -1 + patch
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I reported that IOWeight config item in systemd has no effect
> on recent Debian ke
://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/19/1934
Perhaps the Debian-kernel maintainers would consider creating a 5.4 amd64
kernel-package with this patch implemented. Just as
*linux-image-5.4.0-0.bpo.4-amd64* package in buster-backports repository.
In the light of SEDs (self-encrypting drives) the latest years have
Thanks Ben
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Hutchings
> Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2020 11:50 AM
> To: Mark Pearson
> Cc: Pete Batard ; Debian kernel maintainers ker...@lists.debian.org>
> Subject: [External] Difficulties with kernel package contributions
>
> I&#
I'm not cc'ing the BTS on this as this discussion is no longer specific
to one bug report.
On Sun, 10 May 2020 16:46:47 + Mark Pearson wrote:
[...]
> I'm hesitant to post to this thread as I don't agree with all of Pete's
> points,
> but this thread somewhat resonated, especially this last c
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 878146 src:linux
Bug #878146 [kernel-common] kernel-common: mac80211 module crash
Bug reassigned from package 'kernel-common' to 'src:linux'.
No longer marked as found in versions 4.12.0-1-amd64.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions o
On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 18:23 +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
[...]
> > ..., so I'll try again with setting 'debug-info' to 'false' both in
> > 'debian/config/defines' and 'debian/config/i386/defines'.
>
> Eh, same result/problem... ;-/
>
> I'll (later) try to figure out the right edits or commands
Hi!
On 2020-03-05T09:35:16+0100, I wrote:
> To test something, I need to rebuild the official Debian Linux kernel
> package, so I'm following
> <https://kernel-team.pages.debian.net/kernel-handbook/ch-common-tasks.html#s-common-official>
> "4.2. Rebuilding off
-
Mentor Graphics (Deutschland) GmbH, Arnulfstraße 201, 80634 München / Germany
Registergericht München HRB 106955, Geschäftsführer: Thomas Heurung, Alexander
Walter
--- Begin Message ---
Hi!
To test something, I need to rebuild the official Debian Linux kernel
package, so I&#
On Wed, 2020-01-29 at 07:58 -0600, Adam Thompson wrote:
> Same failure mode continues to exist in 5.3 kernel package.
> How best to upload 5000+ lines of dmesg here?
As an attachment.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
I'm not a reverse psychological virus.
Please don't copy me int
Same failure mode continues to exist in 5.3 kernel package.
How best to upload 5000+ lines of dmesg here?
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #946791 [linux] io.weight cannot be enabled in recent Debian kernel package
Added tag(s) patch.
--
946791: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=946791
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Source: linux
Followup-For: Bug #946791
Control: tags -1 + patch
Dear Maintainer,
I reported that IOWeight config item in systemd has no effect
on recent Debian kernels. I found the root cause.
io.weight was changed to io.bfq.weight, and recent systemd sets
values of IOWeight to io.bfq.weight as
ture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '5.3.15-1'
Marked as found in versions 5.3.15-1.
> retitle -1 io.weight cannot be enabled in recent Debian kernel package
Bug #946791 [linux] systemd: IOWeight config item does not take effect under
cgroupv2 / unified hie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am no longer trying to configure backported kernel-sources now, but in
fact my build-pc has the stable (buster) distribution software-set now, there
seems to be some problem about SSL, and I cannot see which option to disable
in the crypto-section o
Realizing this thread is now a few years old: I had the same error
(transfer buffer not dma capable, coming from usb_hcd_map_urb_for_dma)
using a Line6 Pod XT through the snd-usb-pod kernel module (uses
snd-usb-line6), the machine running stock kernel package 4.9.0-9.
Inspecting the source, it
Hi
I made small mistake in old kernel version.
Previous working properly kernel is of linux-image-4.9.0-6-amd64 with
version 4.9.82-1+deb9u3.
Sorry,
Rolandas
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
Control: tag -1 pending
I got fed up of seeing ia64 build failures so I've re-added ia64
configurations on the master branch.
On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 01:20 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>
> On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 19:04 -0500, Jason Duerstock wrote
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 - moreinfo
Bug #886693 [src:linux] linux: please reinstate ia64 for the linux kernel
package
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> tag -1 pending
Bug #886693 [src:linux] linux: please reinstate ia64 for the linux kernel
package
Added tag(s) pending.
--
886693:
Control: reassign -1 src:spl-linux 0.7.5-1
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/zfsonlinux/spl/issues/670
Control: retitle -1 spl-linux: Build failure with kernel 4.15 (timer updates)
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 06:32:37PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 05:39:49PM +0
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 src:spl-linux 0.7.5-1
Bug #891235 [linux-headers-4.15.0-1-amd64] linux-headers-4.15.0-1-amd64: dkms
modules, like zfs-dkms and spl-dkms do not compile against this kernel package
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-headers-4.15.0-1-amd64'
Hi
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 05:39:49PM +0100, Hans Freitag wrote:
> I have problems updating to kernel 4.15 due to the fact that zfs-dkms and spl-
> dkms won't compile automatically anymore.
There is not much that the kernel can do if other stuff does not follow.
Please write the bug against corre
Unfortunately, I was to fast, the workaround does not work so I had to
go back on 4.14, but i am sure that you can copy the stuff together. I
tried a similar procedure a few weeks ago.
> Kernel: Linux 4.14.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
> Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-
Package: linux-headers-4.15.0-1-amd64
Version: 4.15.4-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I have problems updating to kernel 4.15 due to the fact that zfs-dkms and spl-
dkms won't compile automatically anymore.
Error Message is:
Building initial module for 4.15.0-1-amd64
configure: error:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #886693 [src:linux] linux: please reinstate ia64 for the linux kernel
package
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
886693: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=886693
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 19:04 -0500, Jason Duerstock wrote:
> Source: linux
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> As you may be aware, the ia64 architecture has recently been added
> back to Debian, but now resides in Debian ports.
> The attached patch
ry.
+# It overwrites specifications from /usr/share/kernel-wedge/package-list.
+#
+Package: fat-modules
+Priority: standard
+
+Package: ide-core-modules
+Depends: kernel-image
+Priority: standard
+Description: IDE support
+ This package contains core IDE support for the kernel.
+
+Package: ide-modu
On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 04:16:50PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Basically, the only thing that I want to see is a specific config for
> that kernel, nothing else. Otherwise, it's going to be too much
> maintenance work. Indeed, it should *not* be a different source upload,
> that's too much work
17 +0900
> Subject: parallel building of kernel package seems broken
> Package: src:linux
> Version: 4.9.30-2+deb9u3
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> In d/changelog, I read there's support for "DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=N",
> but this setting seems broken
Most hardware drivers would also go away.
Which ones?
> Could we see this happening in Debian? Please let us know your thoughts.
Please provide numbers what benefits such a seperate kernel package
would provide. Apart from the raw size I'm not seeing it.
Also the addition of a di
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 01:31:31AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > OTOH, the list of required modules may be small enough for us to
> > enumerate the ones we need for booting in /etc/initramfs-tools/modules.
>
> ...and then you could use MODULES=list. initramfs-tools will still
> follow module st
On Sun, 2017-08-27 at 16:38 -0700, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 05:18:45PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > Thomas, can you elaborate why you think this a good idea? Is this about
> > > boot time of the kernel image? The thing I really do not want to have is
> > > additional ker
On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 05:18:45PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Thomas, can you elaborate why you think this a good idea? Is this about
> > boot time of the kernel image? The thing I really do not want to have is
> > additional kernel source uploads to the archive for just those cloud
> > kernel
Your message dated Sun, 27 Aug 2017 17:07:12 +0100
with message-id <1503850032.4448.3.ca...@decadent.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#873373: parallel building of kernel package seems
broken
has caused the Debian Bug report #873373,
regarding parallel building of kernel package seems broken
On 08/26/2017 12:15 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> a) we need to decide then if we need one kernel flavour for each cloud
> provider or if we can agree on a basic set of kernel compile options
> that every cloud provider can use.
I don't think that's needed at all.
> b) most kernels Debian ships
Package: src:linux
Version: 4.9.30-2+deb9u3
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
In d/changelog, I read there's support for "DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=N",
but this setting seems broken. No actual parallel compiling is proceeded,
as I spotted by running "uptime" command several times during buildin
On Sat, 2017-08-26 at 12:15 +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
[...]
> Thomas, can you elaborate why you think this a good idea? Is this about
> boot time of the kernel image? The thing I really do not want to have is
> additional kernel source uploads to the archive for just those cloud
> kernel ima
On Sat, 2017-08-26 at 11:48 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Dear Kernel maintainers,
>
> As you may know, it's been years that Ubuntu is shipping a kernel
> designed for the cloud. Such a kernel is simply a version of the kernel
> that is stripped down for running on VMs. The point here is that VMs
Hi,
On Sat Aug 26, 2017 at 11:48:22 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Dear Kernel maintainers,
>
> As you may know, it's been years that Ubuntu is shipping a kernel
> designed for the cloud. Such a kernel is simply a version of the kernel
> that is stripped down for running on VMs. The point here i
Dear Kernel maintainers,
As you may know, it's been years that Ubuntu is shipping a kernel
designed for the cloud. Such a kernel is simply a version of the kernel
that is stripped down for running on VMs. The point here is that VMs do
not need all the drivers that we typically build for the generi
Your message dated Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:04:30 +
with message-id <1482365070.2677.6.ca...@decadent.org.uk>
and subject line Re: xen-linux-system-4.7.0-0.bpo.1-amd64: jessie-backports,
depends on kernel-VERSION, not provided by unsigned-kernel-Package
has caused the Debian Bug report #
Package: xen-linux-system-4.7.0-0.bpo.1-amd64
Version: 4.7.2-1~bpo8+1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
Package depends on "linux-image-4.7 (= VERSION)
-
Depends: linux-image-4.7.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 (= 4.7.2-1~bpo8+1), xen-system-amd64
-
On Sun, 2016-08-14 at 11:42 +0200, Oliver Feiler wrote:
> Dear maintainers,
>
> would it be possible to include a03e6fe569713fb3ff0714f8fd7c8785c0ca9e22
> into the 4.6 backports kernel?
[...]
Not immediately, as unstable must be fixed first and then testing (via
the usual propagation).
The next
Dear maintainers,
would it be possible to include a03e6fe569713fb3ff0714f8fd7c8785c0ca9e22
into the 4.6 backports kernel?
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=a03e6fe569713fb3ff0714f8fd7c8785c0ca9e22
Without this patch every kernel from 4.6.1 panics when del
On Thu, 2016-05-05 at 00:07 +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> I upgraded to tag debian/4.6_rc5-1_exp1 today and wanted to provide some
> quick feedback. First of all it's good to no longer have linux-tools
> separately, thanks for doing this.
>
>
> On first build I got messages like this
Hi Ben,
I upgraded to tag debian/4.6_rc5-1_exp1 today and wanted to provide some
quick feedback. First of all it's good to no longer have linux-tools
separately, thanks for doing this.
On first build I got messages like this because config.h is only generated
later in the build and the target in
On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 16:16 +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> I've hit a few issues while upgrading kernel packages to 4.5 and wanted
> to give a quick heads-up.
>
>
> In linux-tools, the following is needed lest dkms packages won't build:
>
> diff --git a/debian/rules.d/scripts/Makefile
Hi Ben,
I've hit a few issues while upgrading kernel packages to 4.5 and wanted
to give a quick heads-up.
In linux-tools, the following is needed lest dkms packages won't build:
diff --git a/debian/rules.d/scripts/Makefile b/debian/rules.d/scripts/Makefile
index 8d97087..b2e2cd3 100644
--- a/de
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #373872 {Done: Ben Hutchings } [src:linux-2.6]
/etc/kernel-img.conf not documented unless 'kernel-package' package installed
Warning: Unknown package 'src:linux-2.6'
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been
On Wed, 2016-01-13 at 12:59 +0800, Jinhua Luo wrote:
Hi All,
Without vdso files and its debuginfo files, the systemtap could not
unwind the user backtrace when the process is interrupted mid-syscall.
It's important for off-cpu profiling.
See https://sourceware.org/ml/systemtap/2016-q1/msg00021.h
Hi All,
Without vdso files and its debuginfo files, the systemtap could not
unwind the user backtrace when the process is interrupted mid-syscall.
It's important for off-cpu profiling.
See https://sourceware.org/ml/systemtap/2016-q1/msg00021.html for the issue.
The ubuntu (14.04) also do vdso_in
updated
flash-kernel package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea
On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 11:58 +0200, Robert Schlabbach wrote:
> Proposed fix: Add flash-kernel 3.45 to jessie-backports and add a
> dependency of any Linux kernels 3.17 or later on at least this
> package version.
Agreed. The important change was made in flash-kernel 3.37 so the
breaks in the kernel
.
Further investigation revealed that the flash-kernel package version 3.35 in
debian jessie neglected to append the DTB to the Linux kernel when flashing it.
flash-kernel package version 3.45 from the unstable distribution has additional
entries in its database, stating that this machine needs
I was basically doing the same steps as the initial poster, I upgraded
my Amilo M 7400 from wheezy-xfce to sid. With diffrent issues.
Wheezy was running fine with kernel 3.2.0-4-486. During dist-upgrade I
noticed a previous kernel version kernel was installed (iirc
3.15-586).
1. On first boot I
W dniu 06.02.2015 o 20:31, Ben Hutchings pisze:
Control: retitle -1 Boot fails due to missing ext4 module
On Fri, 2015-02-06 at 18:48 +0100, Rafał Pietrak wrote:
W dniu 04.02.2015 23:07, Ben Hutchings pisze:
[...]
Severity: grave
Tags: newcomer
Justification: renders package unusable
I've u
Control: retitle -1 Keyboard non-functional on LG X-note LS50a
(I've split this into two bug reports.)
On Fri, 2015-02-06 at 18:48 +0100, Rafał Pietrak wrote:
[...]
> >> 4. DRM:i9xx fails to configure with "*ERROR* pipe A underrun"
> > Please send the full kernel boot messages when booting with o
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 Keyboard non-functional on LG X-note LS50a
Bug #776909 [src:linux] kernel-package: couple of modules fail to load after
wheezy to jessie upgrade
Changed Bug title to 'Keyboard non-functional on LG X-note LS50a' from
'kernel-package:
Control: retitle -1 Boot fails due to missing ext4 module
On Fri, 2015-02-06 at 18:48 +0100, Rafał Pietrak wrote:
> W dniu 04.02.2015 23:07, Ben Hutchings pisze:
[...]
> >> Severity: grave
> >> Tags: newcomer
> >> Justification: renders package unusable
> >>
> >> I've upgraded my LG notebook (X-no
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 Boot fails due to missing ext4 module
Bug #777243 [initramfs-tools] kernel-package: couple of modules fail to load
after wheezy to jessie upgrade
Changed Bug title to 'Boot fails due to missing ext4 module' from
'kernel-package: coup
W dniu 04.02.2015 23:07, Ben Hutchings pisze:
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Tue, 03 Feb 2015 10:20:42 +0100 Rafal Pietrak wrote:
Package: kernel-package
Version: 13.014+nmu1
This is not the right package name. The kernel is packaged as
linux-image-3.16.0-4-586 (and other names). What version
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Tue, 03 Feb 2015 10:20:42 +0100 Rafal Pietrak wrote:
> Package: kernel-package
> Version: 13.014+nmu1
This is not the right package name. The kernel is packaged as
linux-image-3.16.0-4-586 (and other names). What version of that
package do you have ins
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #776909 [src:linux] kernel-package: couple of modules fail to load after
wheezy to jessie upgrade
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
776909: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=776909
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #776909 [src:linux] kernel-package: couple of modules fail to load after
wheezy to jessie upgrade
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #776909 to the same tags previously set
--
776909: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=776
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jan 2015 19:50:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#770102: fixed in linux 3.16.7-ckt4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #770102,
regarding PATCH: fix packaging the hppa kernel package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Mon, 19 Jan 2015 01:49:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#770102: fixed in linux 3.18.3-1~exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #770102,
regarding PATCH: fix packaging the hppa kernel package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Karsten Merker (2014-12-01):
> I would like to kindly ask what the current plans are regarding
> the next kernel package upload and getting a freeze exception for
> it. Is there already some agreement with the release team?
>
> I ask because I would really like to see the fix fo
Hello,
I would like to kindly ask what the current plans are regarding
the next kernel package upload and getting a freeze exception for
it. Is there already some agreement with the release team?
I ask because I would really like to see the fix for bug
#767042 (which is in current SVN) going
Source: linux
Version: 3.16.7-2
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Dear debian kernel maintainers,
please apply the attached patch to the debian kernel sources for the next
upload.
It fixes this error when building and packaging the debian hppa kernel:
...
kernel-wedge install-files 3.16.0-4
...
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 11:24 +0100, Joerg Henner wrote:
[...]
> Could you please help me to install "3.12.xxx" Releases, as it is described
> here: http://packages.debian.org/de/sid/linux-image-amd64
>
> And how do i include them in my "sources.list" ?
>
> Thanks in advance for your help and answe
Hello,
on my WHEEZY System, i got following output:
aptitude search latest
p kde-sc-dev-latest - ensure that
the latest KDE Development Platform is installed
v linux-latest-modules-3.2.0-4-486 -
v linux-latest-modules
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 src:linux
Bug #721635 [kernel-package] [kernel-package] error on shutdown
Bug reassigned from package 'kernel-package' to 'src:linux'.
No longer marked as found in versions kernel-package/12.036+nmu3.
Ignoring request to alte
control: reassign -1 src:linux
On Dienstag, 3. September 2013, Marco Righi wrote:
> The problem are born after apt-get dist-upgrade to the last kernel
>
> uname -a
> Linux gaia 3.10-2-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.10.7-1 (2013-08-17) x86_64
> GNU/Linux
>
> It's a standard kernel.
thanks for info, reass
I've applied these patches (to trunk).
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Teamwork is essential - it allows you to blame someone else.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Here's the diff between control files for linux-image-3.11-rc4-amd64
before and after this patch series (ignoring the md5sums):
diff -urN linux-image-3.11-rc4-amd64_3.11~rc4-1~exp1_amd64/DEBIAN/control
linux-image-3.11-rc4-amd64_3.11~rc4-1~exp2_amd64/DEBIAN/control
--- linux-image-3.11-rc4-amd64_
During DebCamp I started work on cleaning up the maintainer scripts and
the templating for them. I'm going to post changes for review in
several groups.
As a first step, this patch series changes several files from
kernel-package template system, now implemented using sed expressions in
d
Your message dated Mon, 24 Sep 2012 16:08:56 -0700
with message-id <20120924230856.GA30488@elie.Belkin>
and subject line Re: [squeeze] kernel package should conflict with lvm2 package
from Lenny
has caused the Debian Bug report #567591,
regarding linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64: kernel p
Your message dated Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:03:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#664171: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.108
has caused the Debian Bug report #664171,
regarding initramfs-tools: initrd cannot be easily disabled when not using
kernel-package
to be marked as done.
This means
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 09:08:54AM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
>> I was thinking that x32 would just duplicate the linux-image-*-amd64
>> packages,
>> similar to the way i386 currently generates amd64 kernel packages.
> [...]
>
> No, that'
OK, I eventually figured out that I also need to add x32 to the architecture
list in debian/config/defines. Then I also changed the x32 compiler to gcc-4.7
by following the example of alpha using gcc-4.5. But then checking
debian/control, it turned out that the -amd64 header packages were depe
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 09:08:54AM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> OK, I eventually figured out that I also need to add x32 to the architecture
> list in debian/config/defines. Then I also changed the x32 compiler to
> gcc-4.7
> by following the example of alpha using gcc-4.5. But then checkin
trol, but the new architecture still isn't registering
> in debian/rules.gen:
But x32 is a partial architecture; there will never be a kernel or
installer for it. The current kernel package doesn't support that at
all.
> dh_testdir
> /usr/bin/make -f debian/rules.gen source_x32
Hi, over the past week or two I've been working on bootstrapping Debian
packages for x32. As of now, linux-libc-dev is the last remaining package
before I have enough built (at least with by-hand builds) to be able to do a
debootstrap.
So, I've been trying to add x32 support to the linux-2.6 v
Hi!
Ping, any news?
Thanks,
Petr "Pasky" Baudis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120511151511.gi6...@machine.or.cz
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.100
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
when creating kernel package by other means than make-kpkg
(e.g. using the kernel's make deb-pkg target), initrd creation
cannot be disabled easily, since the appropriate script checks
wh
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 17:09:32 -0500 (EST), Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> kernel-package is apparently not compatible with Linux 3.x and I don't
> believe it can be released with wheezy in this state.
>
> You have not uploaded a new version for 18 months. If you do not have
>
kernel-package is apparently not compatible with Linux 3.x and I don't
believe it can be released with wheezy in this state.
You have not uploaded a new version for 18 months. If you do not have
time to work on kernel-package, please RFH/RFA/orphan it as appropriate.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchin
On Sun, 2011-09-04 at 20:06 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> I don't want to waste your time, but there are enough changes here
> that a split patchset would improve reviewing.
Perhaps, but they're really not huge.
> > if [ "$os" = "linux" ] ; then
> > - if [ ! -e "$moddir/modules.dep" ]; then
> > -
I don't want to waste your time, but there are enough changes here
that a split patchset would improve reviewing.
> if [ "$os" = "linux" ] ; then
> - if [ ! -e "$moddir/modules.dep" ]; then
> - echo "no $moddir/modules.dep. This file is required by
> kernel-wedge" >&2
> -
;, ", $builddep)) {
- push @builddeps, "$pkg [$arch]";
+ if ($builddep ne "-") {
+ foreach my $pkg (split(", ", $builddep)) {
+ push @builddeps, "$pkg [$arch]";
+ }
}
}
1 - 100 of 629 matches
Mail list logo
