On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 03:47:29PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 12:33:07PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> I agree that it's difficult to change any current tool to make this. I
> >> like the proposal a lot :-D
> >
> > Wou
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 12:33:07PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> I agree that it's difficult to change any current tool to make this. I
>> like the proposal a lot :-D
>
> Would you care to say so on the google SoC page, and eventually become the
> offic
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 12:33:07PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> What's the planned features for it?
> >
> > The idea is to parse the Kconfig, and generate a graph, which represents all
> > the Kconfig dependencies (and conditions), multiplied by ea
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> What's the planned features for it?
>
> The idea is to parse the Kconfig, and generate a graph, which represents all
> the Kconfig dependencies (and conditions), multiplied by each
> arch/subarch/flavour we have.
>
> This would lead to a representation of
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 10:27:55AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 08:58:45AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >>
> >> > What do you think about this project ?
> >>
> >> What would be the main dif
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 03:12:00PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 08:58:45AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> > > What do you think about this project ?
> >
> > What would be the main difference between your proposal and the
> > current kernel
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 08:58:45AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>
>> > What do you think about this project ?
>>
>> What would be the main difference between your proposal and the
>> current kernel configuration tool? Why n
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 08:58:45AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > What do you think about this project ?
>
> What would be the main difference between your proposal and the
> current kernel configuration tool? Why not just improve the current
> tools?
Notice that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> What do you think about this project ?
What would be the main difference between your proposal and the
current kernel configuration tool? Why not just improve the current
tools?
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
heya,
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 11:53:04AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> At the occasion of the Google Summer of Code, I have to create a kernel
> configuration management tool.
> The tool will make is possible to give a tree of the possible options of
> configur
Hello,
At the occasion of the Google Summer of Code, I have to create a kernel
configuration management tool.
The tool will make is possible to give a tree of the possible options of
configuration and the list of the modules which can be created by these options
(either even those which are
11 matches
Mail list logo
