On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:31:12PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> What about:
> 5) Upload kernel-package backport and linux-2.6 backport to volatile
> Is this somehow not permitted by volatile policy?
It is. But aba, the volatile maintainer responds to a question with with
"im allgemeinen" ("general
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:31:12PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 04:15 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 01:49:49PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 21:21 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:32:17AM -0500, Manoj
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:31:12PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 04:15 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 01:49:49PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 21:21 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:32:17AM -0500, Manoj
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 04:15 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 01:49:49PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 21:21 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:32:17AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > So we are taki
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 01:49:49PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 21:21 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:32:17AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > So we are taking the version in Sarge, and just making a
> > > couple of change
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 01:49:49PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 21:21 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:32:17AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > So we are taking the version in Sarge, and just making a
> > > couple of change
On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 21:21 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:32:17AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > So we are taking the version in Sarge, and just making a
> > couple of changes to it an uploading? Whynot just take the very
> > latest version of ker
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:32:17AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So we are taking the version in Sarge, and just making a
> couple of changes to it an uploading? Whynot just take the very
> latest version of kernel-package and put that in t-p-u?
Because we are aiming volatile
Hi,
So we are taking the version in Sarge, and just making a
couple of changes to it an uploading? Whynot just take the very
latest version of kernel-package and put that in t-p-u?
manoj
--
An object never serves the same function as its image -- or its
name. Rene Magritte
Mano
Hi,
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 15:34:11 +0900, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Sven Luther has prepared an update of kernel-package that fixes some
> minor problems that prevent the sarge version from being able to
> compile linux-2.6, which we would like to get included in volatile.
> I'm writing t
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 03:34:11PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> Hi Manoj,
>
> Sven Luther has prepared an update of kernel-package that
> fixes some minor problems that prevent the sarge version
> from being able to compile linux-2.6, which we would
> like to get included in volatile.
>
> The package, a
Hi Manoj,
Sven Luther has prepared an update of kernel-package that
fixes some minor problems that prevent the sarge version
from being able to compile linux-2.6, which we would
like to get included in volatile.
The package, and its changes are here, though you
will have to ask Sven about the det
12 matches
Mail list logo
