Re: kernel-package Help

2004-08-24 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 11:11:31AM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote: > Hi, > > Horms writes: > > > > A separate source package raises synchronization issues. So those > > > meta packages should just be removed from older kernel-image source > > > packages. > > > > Could you elaborate on what synchr

Re: kernel-package Help

2004-08-24 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 07:14:04AM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote: > Hi, > > Sven Luther writes: > > > The solution to this is to create a kernel-image-meta or whatever > > source package, which provides the kernel-image- and the > > kernel-image--2.[46] packages. > > A separate source package rai

Re: kernel-package Help

2004-08-24 Thread Jens Schmalzing
Hi, Horms writes: > > A separate source package raises synchronization issues. So those > > meta packages should just be removed from older kernel-image source > > packages. > > Could you elaborate on what synchronisation issues you forsee? The two scenarios that spring to my mind immediately

Re: kernel-package Help

2004-08-24 Thread Horms
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 07:14:04AM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote: > Hi, > > Sven Luther writes: > > > The solution to this is to create a kernel-image-meta or whatever > > source package, which provides the kernel-image- and the > > kernel-image--2.[46] packages. > > A separate source package rai

Re: kernel-package Help

2004-08-24 Thread Jens Schmalzing
Hi, Sven Luther writes: > The solution to this is to create a kernel-image-meta or whatever > source package, which provides the kernel-image- and the > kernel-image--2.[46] packages. A separate source package raises synchronization issues. So those meta packages should just be removed from old

Re: kernel-package Help

2004-08-24 Thread Jens Schmalzing
Hi, Manoj Srivastava writes: > > To clarify the problem there are two source packages, > > kernel-image-1-i386-2.4.26 and kernel-image-1-i386-2.4.27, each of > > These don't seem to be packages generated by kernel-package, Of course not. Horms is talking about the *source* packages, which are

Re: kernel-package Help

2004-08-23 Thread Horms
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 10:46:04AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 14:59:17 +0900, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > If it helps, you can see a list of packages that are provided by > > kernel-image-1-i386-2.4.26 at the following URL. The ones that don't > > contain 2.4.

Re: kernel-package Help

2004-08-23 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 09:21:41 +0200, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > It seems thought, and that is where you come in, that from horms > experience, removing those meta-packages from the packages makes > make-kpkg fail to build the package, which is what horms was trying > to tell you. Coul

Re: kernel-package Help

2004-08-23 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 14:59:17 +0900, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > thanks for your quick response. However, I don't think that using an > epoch will reslove the problem. > To clarify the problem there are two source packages, > kernel-image-1-i386-2.4.26 and kernel-image-1-i386-2.4.27, each

Re: kernel-package Help

2004-08-23 Thread Horms
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 02:59:17PM +0900, Horms wrote: > On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 11:43:10PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 13:03:56 +0900, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > > > This is to get around the problem where these packages are rejected > > > as their version,

Re: kernel-package Help

2004-08-23 Thread Sven Luther
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 11:43:10PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 13:03:56 +0900, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > This is to get around the problem where these packages are rejected > > as their version, 2.4.26-6 is less than the version currently in > > debian provid

Re: kernel-package Help

2004-08-23 Thread Horms
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 11:43:10PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 13:03:56 +0900, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > This is to get around the problem where these packages are rejected > > as their version, 2.4.26-6 is less than the version currently in > > debian provid

Re: kernel-package Help

2004-08-22 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 13:03:56 +0900, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > This is to get around the problem where these packages are rejected > as their version, 2.4.26-6 is less than the version currently in > debian provided by kernel-image-1-i386-2.4.27, that is version > 2.4.27-X. This will allo

kernel-package Help [Was: kernel-image-2.4.26-i386_2.4.26-6_i386.changes REJECTED]

2004-08-22 Thread Horms
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 11:17:00AM +0900, Horms wrote: > On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 09:03:06AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 08:22:41AM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > > > * Sven Luther wrote: > > > > Who uploaded 2.4.27 packages to unstable forgeting to rename them to > > >