On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 11:11:31AM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Horms writes:
>
> > > A separate source package raises synchronization issues. So those
> > > meta packages should just be removed from older kernel-image source
> > > packages.
> >
> > Could you elaborate on what synchr
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 07:14:04AM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sven Luther writes:
>
> > The solution to this is to create a kernel-image-meta or whatever
> > source package, which provides the kernel-image- and the
> > kernel-image--2.[46] packages.
>
> A separate source package rai
Hi,
Horms writes:
> > A separate source package raises synchronization issues. So those
> > meta packages should just be removed from older kernel-image source
> > packages.
>
> Could you elaborate on what synchronisation issues you forsee?
The two scenarios that spring to my mind immediately
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 07:14:04AM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sven Luther writes:
>
> > The solution to this is to create a kernel-image-meta or whatever
> > source package, which provides the kernel-image- and the
> > kernel-image--2.[46] packages.
>
> A separate source package rai
Hi,
Sven Luther writes:
> The solution to this is to create a kernel-image-meta or whatever
> source package, which provides the kernel-image- and the
> kernel-image--2.[46] packages.
A separate source package raises synchronization issues. So those
meta packages should just be removed from old
Hi,
Manoj Srivastava writes:
> > To clarify the problem there are two source packages,
> > kernel-image-1-i386-2.4.26 and kernel-image-1-i386-2.4.27, each of
>
> These don't seem to be packages generated by kernel-package,
Of course not. Horms is talking about the *source* packages, which
are
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 10:46:04AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 14:59:17 +0900, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > If it helps, you can see a list of packages that are provided by
> > kernel-image-1-i386-2.4.26 at the following URL. The ones that don't
> > contain 2.4.
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 09:21:41 +0200, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> It seems thought, and that is where you come in, that from horms
> experience, removing those meta-packages from the packages makes
> make-kpkg fail to build the package, which is what horms was trying
> to tell you. Coul
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 14:59:17 +0900, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> thanks for your quick response. However, I don't think that using an
> epoch will reslove the problem.
> To clarify the problem there are two source packages,
> kernel-image-1-i386-2.4.26 and kernel-image-1-i386-2.4.27, each
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 02:59:17PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 11:43:10PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 13:03:56 +0900, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >
> > > This is to get around the problem where these packages are rejected
> > > as their version,
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 11:43:10PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 13:03:56 +0900, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > This is to get around the problem where these packages are rejected
> > as their version, 2.4.26-6 is less than the version currently in
> > debian provid
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 11:43:10PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 13:03:56 +0900, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > This is to get around the problem where these packages are rejected
> > as their version, 2.4.26-6 is less than the version currently in
> > debian provid
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 13:03:56 +0900, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> This is to get around the problem where these packages are rejected
> as their version, 2.4.26-6 is less than the version currently in
> debian provided by kernel-image-1-i386-2.4.27, that is version
> 2.4.27-X. This will allo
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 11:17:00AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 09:03:06AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 08:22:41AM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > > * Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > Who uploaded 2.4.27 packages to unstable forgeting to rename them to
> > >
14 matches
Mail list logo