On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 05:15:42PM +, Steve Kemp wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 09:55:37AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> > hey,
> > I'd like to announce our intent to proceed with rev'ing the ABI for the
> > "sarge2" set of kernel security updates that the kernel team is currently
> > prepar
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 09:55:37AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> hey,
> I'd like to announce our intent to proceed with rev'ing the ABI for the
> "sarge2" set of kernel security updates that the kernel team is currently
> preparing. There are at least 3 outstanding security issues[1] that
> would
hey,
I'd like to announce our intent to proceed with rev'ing the ABI for the
"sarge2" set of kernel security updates that the kernel team is currently
preparing. There are at least 3 outstanding security issues[1] that
would trigger an ABI change, two of which have been known since before
r0.
A
On Thursday 15 December 2005 17:55, dann frazier wrote:
> As far as I can tell, an ABI change only breaks d-i if it is
> incorporated into a point release - updates to security.debian.org
> should be safe.
Yes, that is correct. There is no problem for d-i until the new kernel
enters the main arch
4 matches
Mail list logo
