On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 10:08:39PM +0200, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 08:24:49PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Maximilian Attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > also it would be _very_ cool to do the switch after a major upload.
> > > just the switch to the newer too
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 07:58:10PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 07:31:18PM +0200, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 06:58:55PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > > Do you have a link to it ? And does it support using yaird as alternative
> > > ? Or
> > >
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 08:24:49PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Maximilian Attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > also it would be _very_ cool to do the switch after a major upload.
> > just the switch to the newer tools and nothing else.
> > ubuntu has been bitten by this transition.
> > the u
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 08:24:49PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > I guess we could add a version specific check into the
> > > postinst to default to using yaird or mkinitramfs , if installed,
> > > in preference to mkinitrd, though I am usually hesitant to add in
> > > version depe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005 17:44:02 +0200
Maximilian Attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 09:29:06AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
[snip snip]
> > mkinitramfs fails if the kernel
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005 17:57:08 +0200
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mkyaird (or whatever it is called)
mkinitrd.yaird is the name of the yaird wrapper with mkinitrd options.
- Jonas
- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 07:31:18PM +0200, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 06:58:55PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > Do you have a link to it ? And does it support using yaird as alternative ?
> > Or
> > running initrd 2.4 or pre-2.6.12 kernels ?
>
> it's supporting initrd-to
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 06:58:55PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Do you have a link to it ? And does it support using yaird as alternative ? Or
> running initrd 2.4 or pre-2.6.12 kernels ?
it's supporting initrd-tools on hppa and ia64 afaik.
> The above proposal works with kernel-package just fi
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 06:43:54PM +0200, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 05:57:08PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 09:29:06AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > > On Mon, 3 Oct 2005 13:03:45 +0200, Maximilian Attems
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > >
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 05:57:08PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 09:29:06AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > On Mon, 3 Oct 2005 13:03:45 +0200, Maximilian Attems
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >
> > > naa initramfs-tools are in the archive an working for all arch but
> >
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 09:29:06AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Err. putting
> ramdisk = /usr/sbin/mkinitramfs
> in /etc/kernel-img.conf does seem to work.
indeed, thanks for pointing that out.
> Or are you talking about
> using mkinitramfs by default? mkinitramfs fails if the
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 09:29:06AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Oct 2005 13:03:45 +0200, Maximilian Attems
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > naa initramfs-tools are in the archive an working for all arch but
> > sparc (klibc ftbfs there with gcc3.4/4.0).
>
> > the kernel-package d
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005 13:03:45 +0200, Maximilian Attems
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> naa initramfs-tools are in the archive an working for all arch but
> sparc (klibc ftbfs there with gcc3.4/4.0).
> the kernel-package does not yet use the initramfs-tools. you need to
> invoke update-initramfs like
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 05:54:51PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 07:38:54PM +0200, Jens Wilke wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I just tried to install a new kernel (2.6.13.2) and went into the problem
> > that
> > there is no devfs support any more but initrd-tools expect that to
> > mount
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 07:38:54PM +0200, Jens Wilke wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I just tried to install a new kernel (2.6.13.2) and went into the problem that
> there is no devfs support any more but initrd-tools expect that to mount/scan
> for the root lvm volume.
Yes, that is a known problem. We are work
Hi!
I just tried to install a new kernel (2.6.13.2) and went into the problem that
there is no devfs support any more but initrd-tools expect that to mount/scan
for the root lvm volume.
A solution to fix this is to include udev in the initrd. I experimented with
another approach and using the sy
16 matches
Mail list logo