Re: goals for 2.6.12-2 (and beyond)

2005-07-21 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 22:57:34 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > >> Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> - get at least 5 archs successfully building; probably i386, plus some >>>combination of the archs that're already in 2.6.12-1 (

Re: goals for 2.6.12-2 (and beyond)

2005-07-21 Thread Erik van Konijnenburg
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 10:57:34PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > And, once all of that is done: > > - start using initramfs instead of an initrd. > > Anyone working on this? I'm fed up with mkinitrd enough to want to > rewrite it, which would use initramfs then. Look for mkinitramfs in

Re: goals for 2.6.12-2 (and beyond)

2005-07-21 Thread Andres Salomon
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 22:57:34 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> - get at least 5 archs successfully building; probably i386, plus some >>combination of the archs that're already in 2.6.12-1 (powerpc, >>ia64, sparc, alpha, s390). The more

Re: goals for 2.6.12-2 (and beyond)

2005-07-21 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > - get at least 5 archs successfully building; probably i386, plus some >combination of the archs that're already in 2.6.12-1 (powerpc, >ia64, sparc, alpha, s390). The more the merrier, of course.. When's >amd64 going to start being autobu

goals for 2.6.12-2 (and beyond)

2005-07-21 Thread Andres Salomon
linux-2.6_2.6.12-1 just hit incoming, woo! My definite goals for 2.6.12-2 are: - differentiate between @longclass@ and @class@, as Frederik pointed out that the @class@ in 2.6.12-1 was making the synopsis line too long. This is already checked into svn; it's up to arch people to update