On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 08:53:37PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> Hi Dann,
>
> Am Dienstag, den 06.04.2010, 16:09 -0600 schrieb dann frazier:
> > 2) After that upload, I will file an RC bug to request the removal of
> > the drbd8-source binary from the drbd8 source package
>
> I finally
Hi Dann,
Am Dienstag, den 06.04.2010, 16:09 -0600 schrieb dann frazier:
> 2) After that upload, I will file an RC bug to request the removal of
> the drbd8-source binary from the drbd8 source package
I finally found time to upload drbd8 with the -source package dropped.
Do you intend to upd
Hi Dann,
Am Dienstag, den 06.04.2010, 16:09 -0600 schrieb dann frazier:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 09:31:20AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > I'd appreciate it if an existing drbd user could test it.
>
> I didn't hear back from the drbd maintainers, but I did get some
> testing feedback from a drbd
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010, dann frazier wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 12:39:47AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> >
> > 2.6.32-12 is expected soonish once the libata HPA patches are finaly
> > cooked. I'd prefer to keep that a minimal fix release. So that we can
> > push -4 into squeeze.
> >
> > c
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 12:39:47AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 04:09:54PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> >
> > My plan is therefore to:
> > 1) Commit these changes for inclusion in the next linux-2.6 upload
> > 2) After that upload, I will file an RC bug to request th
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 04:09:54PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
>
> My plan is therefore to:
> 1) Commit these changes for inclusion in the next linux-2.6 upload
> 2) After that upload, I will file an RC bug to request the removal of
> the drbd8-source binary from the drbd8 source package
>
>
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 12:02:00AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 04:02:22PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:45:54PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > > On 2010-03-30, dann frazier wrote:
> > > > drbd maintainers,
> > > >
> > > > As you no d
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 09:31:20AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> drbd maintainers,
>
> As you no doubt know, linux-modules-extra has been dropped for
> squeeze. The recommended[1] direction for building out-of-tree module
> is to either:
>
> a) get merged into linux-2.6
> b) use the dkms framewo
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 04:02:22PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:45:54PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > On 2010-03-30, dann frazier wrote:
> > > drbd maintainers,
> > >
> > > As you no doubt know, linux-modules-extra has been dropped for
> > > squeeze. The recommend
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:45:54PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On 2010-03-30, dann frazier wrote:
> > drbd maintainers,
> >
> > As you no doubt know, linux-modules-extra has been dropped for
> > squeeze. The recommended[1] direction for building out-of-tree module
> > is to either:
> >
> >
On 2010-03-30, dann frazier wrote:
> drbd maintainers,
>
> As you no doubt know, linux-modules-extra has been dropped for
> squeeze. The recommended[1] direction for building out-of-tree module
> is to either:
>
> a) get merged into linux-2.6
> b) use the dkms framework
>
> DRBD is now merged up
drbd maintainers,
As you no doubt know, linux-modules-extra has been dropped for
squeeze. The recommended[1] direction for building out-of-tree module
is to either:
a) get merged into linux-2.6
b) use the dkms framework
DRBD is now merged upstream, so it seems like a good candidate for
option
12 matches
Mail list logo
