On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 12:06:11PM -0400, Robert Goley wrote:
> I am not trying to debate the firmware subject but I would like a little
> information. I know that there are issues with linking binary
> (non-free) with certain drivers. What is the exact procedure that will
> be used with these dr
I am not trying to debate the firmware subject but I would like a little information. I know that there are issues with linking binary (non-free) with certain drivers. What is the exact procedure that will be used with these drivers? I have to use several drivers on this list. Are they just
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 06:35:40PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> Please, no debates on the firmware subject.
>> Here is the current blacklist of tainted files that need to be
>> sanitized and/or removed from virgin mainline.
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 03:35:27AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 06:35:40PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> Please, no debates on the firmware subject.
>
> Here is the current blacklist of tainted files that need to be
> sanitized and/or removed from virgin mainline.
>
> drivers/net/acenic_firmware.h
> drivers/net/dgrs_firmware.c
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 06:35:40PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> Please, no debates on the firmware subject.
>
> Here is the current blacklist of tainted files that need to be
> sanitized and/or removed from virgin mainline.
Why is drivers/scsi/qlogicisp_asm.c not on this list?
--
"Next
Please, no debates on the firmware subject.
Here is the current blacklist of tainted files that need to be
sanitized and/or removed from virgin mainline.
drivers/net/acenic_firmware.h
drivers/net/dgrs_firmware.c
drivers/net/tg3.c
drivers/net/tokenring/smctr_firmware.h
drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/ql2100_
6 matches
Mail list logo
