Re: changelog format

2005-09-12 Thread Filippo Giunchedi
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 07:49:29PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > filippo, with his devscripts' co-maint hat on > > What about supporting various formats, and in particular supporting our own > proposed format ? Looks fine to me, please feel free to open a bug against devscripts (I'll do if needed

Re: changelog format

2005-09-12 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 02:22:47PM +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote: > Horms wrote: > >>>Notice that the [] part will probably become a standard all among > >>>debian as dch enforces it, so maybe it is worthwhile thinking about it. > >> > >>Yes, perhaps I should be attacking the root of the problem.

Re: changelog format

2005-09-12 Thread Filippo Giunchedi
Horms wrote: >>>Notice that the [] part will probably become a standard all among >>>debian as dch enforces it, so maybe it is worthwhile thinking about it. >> >>Yes, perhaps I should be attacking the root of the problem. See #326064. >>Perhaps discussion of this is a bit premature until we hear

Re: changelog format

2005-09-02 Thread Horms
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 12:28:22PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 08:59 +0900, Horms wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 02:58:30PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 07:35:25AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 12:30:41AM -0400,

Re: changelog format

2005-09-02 Thread Andres Salomon
On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 08:59 +0900, Horms wrote: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 02:58:30PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 07:35:25AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 12:30:41AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > > [...] > > > > > > Well, we have not decided,

Re: changelog format

2005-09-01 Thread Horms
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 02:58:30PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 07:35:25AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 12:30:41AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > [...] > > > > Well, we have not decided, the first [] is thrown in by dch, and > > people are still u

Re: changelog format

2005-09-01 Thread Andres Salomon
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 07:35:25AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 12:30:41AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: [...] > > Well, we have not decided, the first [] is thrown in by dch, and > people are still using the same format as always, and maybe not always remove > the [] bit. >

Re: changelog format

2005-08-31 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 12:30:41AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > Argh. > > 2.6.12-6's changelog is awful; there are multiple types of styles in there. > Can we *please* have some consistency in the changelog entries? The format > that we've used for ages has been: > > * () (closes: ) > > If

changelog format

2005-08-31 Thread Andres Salomon
Argh. 2.6.12-6's changelog is awful; there are multiple types of styles in there. Can we *please* have some consistency in the changelog entries? The format that we've used for ages has been: * () (closes: ) If the fix is a security or arch-specific fix, it's been: * [] () (closes: #) So