On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 13:56 -0600, Ryan Underwood wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 09:38:58AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> >
> > hey Ryan,
> > Your best bet is to continue to push for upstream acceptance:
> > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelPatchAcceptanceGuidelines
>
> What about the f
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 09:38:58AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
>
> hey Ryan,
> Your best bet is to continue to push for upstream acceptance:
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelPatchAcceptanceGuidelines
What about the fact that bigphysarea was included in Debian's 2.4
kernel? That causes
On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 23:45 -0600, Ryan Underwood wrote:
> Hi debian-kernel,
>
> I asked a little while ago why Debian doesn't include the bigphysarea
> patch:
> http://pv105234.reshsg.uci.edu/~jfeise/Downloads/zr36120/
> This is necessary for hardware which doesn't support scatter gather DMA.
> I
Hi debian-kernel,
I asked a little while ago why Debian doesn't include the bigphysarea
patch:
http://pv105234.reshsg.uci.edu/~jfeise/Downloads/zr36120/
This is necessary for hardware which doesn't support scatter gather DMA.
I asked linux-kernel why they don't merge it, and received no answer.
I
4 matches
Mail list logo