Ian Campbell:
> There were some other errors in the original buildd log at
> http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=linux&arch=arm64&ver=3.14.12-1&stamp=1405234443
> but they were resolved as part of this patch too so I didn't investigate
> much further. Some of them were missing pr
On Mon, 2014-07-21 at 16:01 +0900, sf...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> Ian Campbell:
> > In file included from /=ABPKGBUILDDIR=BB/include/linux/mm.h:23:0,
> > from /=ABPKGBUILDDIR=BB/include/linux/pid_namespace.h:6,
> > from /=ABPKGBUILDDIR=BB/include/linux/ptrace
Ian Campbell:
> In file included from /=ABPKGBUILDDIR=BB/include/linux/mm.h:23:0,
> from /=ABPKGBUILDDIR=BB/include/linux/pid_namespace.h:6,
> from /=ABPKGBUILDDIR=BB/include/linux/ptrace.h:9,
> from /=ABPKGBUILDDIR=BB/arch/arm64/include/asm/compa
> Re-reading several makefiles,
> - fs/proc/Makefile builds nommu.o and task_nommu.o unconditionally.
> - mm/Makeilfe builds nommu.o unconditionally.
>
> So I change my mind and stop adding ifndef CONFIG_MMU.
Oops! I was wrong. Sorry.
Please ignore my previous mail.
J. R. Okajima
--
To UNSUB
Ian Campbell:
> > #ifndef CONFIG_MMU was less important since the built kernel doesn't
> > contain the functions defined in the header as long as they are unused.
> > But by moving them into a source file, the built kernel will contain
> > them. So ifndef CONFIG_MMU is necessary this time.
>
> Yes
On Mon, 2014-07-21 at 04:47 +0900, sf...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> Ian Campbell:
> > The following patch which does what I think you are suggesting works OK
> > for me too.
>
> Thanks for the patch.
> #ifndef CONFIG_MMU was less important since the built kernel doesn't
> contain the functions
Ian Campbell:
> The following patch which does what I think you are suggesting works OK
> for me too.
Thanks for the patch.
#ifndef CONFIG_MMU was less important since the built kernel doesn't
contain the functions defined in the header as long as they are unused.
But by moving them into a source
;
> That sounds like a plausible plan to me.
The following patch which does what I think you are suggesting works OK
for me too.
8<--
From: Ian Campbell
Subject: aufs3: remove include of linux/fs.h from linux/mm.h
This include is added by aufs3-mmap.patch but causes cir
On Sun, 2014-07-20 at 02:38 +0900, sf...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> Hello Ian,
>
> Ian Campbell:
> > This include is added by aufs3-mmap.patch but causes circular
> > dependencies on arm64 as seen with the Debian kernel packages in
> :::
> > According to http://article.gmane.org/gmane.li
Hello Ian,
Ian Campbell:
> This include is added by aufs3-mmap.patch but causes circular
> dependencies on arm64 as seen with the Debian kernel packages in
:::
> According to http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/342042
> > The added mm.h->fs.h looks like a mistake, it sho
(resending since original post was rejected by aufs-users)
This include is added by aufs3-mmap.patch but causes circular
dependencies on arm64 as seen with the Debian kernel packages in
http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=linux&arch=arm64&ver=3.14.12-1&stamp=1405234443
which conta
This include is added by aufs3-mmap.patch but causes circular
dependencies on arm64 as seen with the Debian kernel packages in
http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=linux&arch=arm64&ver=3.14.12-1&stamp=1405234443
which contains:
In file included from /«PKGBUILDDIR»/include/linux/mm.
12 matches
Mail list logo
