On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 07:00:00PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Uwe Kleine-K�nig dixit:
Your mailer is broken. And it added:
X-Message-Flag: Your mailer is broken. Get an update at
http://www.washington.edu/pine/getpine/pcpine.html for free.
to your mail :-) I guess it means you not m
Uwe Kleine-K�nig dixit:
>On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 02:28:35PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>> Maybe something like this?
[…]
>> Just an idea of the moment,
Well, it does make the thing compile with minimal effort.
>IMHO the problem is that aufs provides an incomplete definition of
>pr_fmt. Eithe
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 02:28:35PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Ben Hutchings dixit:
>
> >why other architectures get away with it. Maybe they just don't use
> >pr_*() in headers.
>
> Maybe something like this?
>
> #define ack_bad_irq(irq) do { \
> pr_cr
Dixi quod…
>Maybe something like this?
With that, aufs indeed compiles and module-links.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
“Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having
a peeing section in a swimming pool.”
-- Edward Burr
--
To UNSUBSCR
On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 14:28 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Ben Hutchings dixit:
>
> >why other architectures get away with it. Maybe they just don't use
> >pr_*() in headers.
>
> Maybe something like this?
>
> #define ack_bad_irq(irq) do { \
> pr_crit("une
Ben Hutchings dixit:
>why other architectures get away with it. Maybe they just don't use
>pr_*() in headers.
Maybe something like this?
#define ack_bad_irq(irq) do { \
pr_crit("unexpected IRQ trap at vector %02x\n", \
(unsigned int)
Ben Hutchings dixit:
>Maybe, but it should work just as long as AUFS_NAME is also defined in
Right, looks like it.
>advance. Not sure why that's not also provided on the command line, or
Hrm. Can you forward this to the aufs people then, and maybe get
us some fix?
>why other architectures get
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 14:42 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a build of linux-2.6 (3.2~rc4-1~experimental.1) with gcc-4.6 (to
> check whether we can switch to it for the kernel, too) fails:
[...]
> /tmp/buildd/linux-2.6-3.2~rc4/debian/build/source_m68k_none/arch/m68k/include/asm/hardirq.h:
Hi,
a build of linux-2.6 (3.2~rc4-1~experimental.1) with gcc-4.6 (to
check whether we can switch to it for the kernel, too) fails:
[…]
LD [M] fs/affs/affs.o
LD fs/aufs/built-in.o
CC [M] fs/aufs/module.o
In file included from
/tmp/buildd/linux-2.6-3.2~rc4/debian/build/source_m68k_non
9 matches
Mail list logo
