Re: Bug#344833: attached an ugly and hacky patch which allows me to build 2.6.15 on powerpc.

On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 08:56:01AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:22:30 +0100, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 03:36:46AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > >> On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:44:20 +0100, Sven Luther > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

Re: Bug#344833: attached an ugly and hacky patch which allows me to build 2.6.15 on powerpc.

On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:22:30 +0100, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 03:36:46AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:44:20 +0100, Sven Luther >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> And the kernel architiceture is what is passed to the kernel >> Makefil

Re: attached an ugly and hacky patch which allows me to build 2.6.15 on powerpc.

On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 04:30:05AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:49:57 +0100, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > >> > The first hunk of this patch sets ARCH=ppc again for 32bit, i am > >> > not sure i will be going this way or not finally, since upstream > >> > re

Re: Bug#344833: attached an ugly and hacky patch which allows me to build 2.6.15 on powerpc.

On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 03:36:46AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:44:20 +0100, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 10:23:20PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Umm. I'll accept part of this patch -- the part where you set >

Re: attached an ugly and hacky patch which allows me to build 2.6.15 on powerpc.

On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:49:57 +0100, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> > The first hunk of this patch sets ARCH=ppc again for 32bit, i am >> > not sure i will be going this way or not finally, since upstream >> > recomends me to go with ARCH=powerpc on 32bit only for 2.6.16 and >> > later.

Re: Bug#344833: attached an ugly and hacky patch which allows me to build 2.6.15 on powerpc.

On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:44:20 +0100, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 10:23:20PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Umm. I'll accept part of this patch -- the part where you set >> KERNEL_ARCH based on KPKG_SUBARCH. I'm not going to change the >> common/* s

Re: attached an ugly and hacky patch which allows me to build 2.6.15 on powerpc.

On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 10:53:41PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Hi, > On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 21:25:15 +0100, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > hi Manoj, about this issue, i attach a quick and dirty patch, which > > at least pinpoints the two places where we have an issue on > > powerpc

Re: Bug#344833: attached an ugly and hacky patch which allows me to build 2.6.15 on powerpc.

On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 10:23:20PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Hi, > > Umm. I'll accept part of this patch -- the part where you set > KERNEL_ARCH based on KPKG_SUBARCH. I'm not going to change the > common/* stuff just for ppc. If it appears that needs changing, then > there is a

Re: attached an ugly and hacky patch which allows me to build 2.6.15 on powerpc.

Hi, On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 21:25:15 +0100, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > hi Manoj, about this issue, i attach a quick and dirty patch, which > at least pinpoints the two places where we have an issue on > powerpc. The main point is that on powerpc the debian arch is > 'powerpc', while the

attached an ugly and hacky patch which allows me to build 2.6.15 on powerpc.

tags 344833 + patch thanks hi Manoj, about this issue, i attach a quick and dirty patch, which at least pinpoints the two places where we have an issue on powerpc. The main point is that on powerpc the debian arch is 'powerpc', while the kernel arch can be either ppc, ppc64 or powerpc, depending o