This is a record of all the restarts for the last ~24 hours:
Feb 23 08:24:49 debiant kernel: [260162.902256] iwlwifi :04:00.0:
Microcode SW error detected. Restarting 0x200.
Feb 23 10:00:37 debiant kernel: [265911.64] iwlwifi :04:00.0:
Microcode SW error detected. Restarting 0x20
Hello,
is there any progress on this issue? The fix for bug 609538 requires the
firmware files for r8169 which seems to be quite similar to this bug.
Regards,
Eduard.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Hi,
Is there any progress on this bug?
Does this bug occur during normal operation or does it happen with a low
frequency in some corner cases?
TIA for any additional information,
Wolfgang
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64
Version: 2.6.30-3
Severity: normal
Hello
Is there any progress with providing vmlinux somewhere?
There was a suggestion to add support for kernel debugging packges into
the kernel build scripts but not turn it on by default so that the large
debug packages
* Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-28 23:55]:
> /dev/sda3:
> Timing cached reads: 338 MB in 2.00 seconds = 169.12 MB/sec
> Timing buffered disk reads: 16 MB in 3.31 seconds = 4.84 MB/sec
>
> Strangely I measure much lower performance if I on the individual
> partition:
>
>
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 05:48:30PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-21 17:10]:
> > Are there any news on the patch tbm mentioned for #444271? Anything I
> > could test or investigate? I would really love to have better hard disk
> > performance on my
* Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-21 17:10]:
> Are there any news on the patch tbm mentioned for #444271? Anything I
> could test or investigate? I would really love to have better hard disk
> performance on my N2100. Is the patch from Intel available somewhere?
Intel sent me new pat
Hi
Are there any news on the patch tbm mentioned for #444271? Anything I
could test or investigate? I would really love to have better hard disk
performance on my N2100. Is the patch from Intel available somewhere?
Gaudenz
--
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter.
Try again. Fail again. Fail bet
> Looks like we did most of the work twice, did we?
Well not really, I needed the packages back then anyway so no harm done.
> I am almost done preparing a redhat-cluster v2 package based on the
> Ubuntu stuff by Fabio M. Di Nitto, please find it in kernel svn.
Great, I'll rebase my patches once t
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 04:55:00PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 04:39:52PM +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
On Fri, February 23, 2007 16:28, maximilian attems said:
No, unfortunately it seems that the times between loading the usb host
controller, loading usb-storage and s
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 04:39:52PM +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
> On Fri, February 23, 2007 16:28, maximilian attems said:
>
> No, unfortunately it seems that the times between loading the usb host
> controller, loading usb-storage and spawning the usb-storage-scan thread
> are all asynchronous. S
On Fri, February 23, 2007 16:28, maximilian attems said:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 03:05:44PM +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
>> Exactly, considering the low amount of complaints, I'd say there's a
>> tiny minority that is actually affected by this bug.
>>
>> Secondly, there is no way to have the band
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 03:05:44PM +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
>
> Exactly, considering the low amount of complaints, I'd say there's a tiny
> minority that is actually affected by this bug.
>
> Secondly, there is no way to have the bandaid-wait for usb-storage users
> only, instead it would hit
On Fri, February 23, 2007 14:16, maximilian attems said:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 01:46:08PM +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
>> On Fri, February 23, 2007 12:11, maximilian attems said:
>> > On Fri, 23 Feb 2007, David Härdeman wrote:
>
>> > mika's case is general enough, it affects lilo on almost any
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 01:46:08PM +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
> On Fri, February 23, 2007 12:11, maximilian attems said:
> > On Fri, 23 Feb 2007, David Härdeman wrote:
> > mika's case is general enough, it affects lilo on almost any
> > root beside ide and quick sata controller
> > and grub for
On Fri, February 23, 2007 12:11, maximilian attems said:
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2007, David Härdeman wrote:
>
>> maks...any progress on this bug?
>
> no.
> latest initramfs-tools is on mentors without any #401916 yet.
>
>> A new package which exports ROOTDELAY would be
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007, David Härdeman wrote:
> maks...any progress on this bug?
no.
latest initramfs-tools is on mentors without any #401916 yet.
> A new package which exports ROOTDELAY would be nice, then the rest can be
> fixed in udev...
well i don't feel that is enough.
maks...any progress on this bug?
A new package which exports ROOTDELAY would be nice, then the rest can be
fixed in udev...
--
David Härdeman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 09:52:05PM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> any further information on bugs 270321 and 270326? I installed two
> PReP systems in the last few days, and put the root filesystem on
> /dev/sda3. After that, both booting with root=/dev/sda3 and with no
> root option at
Hi,
any further information on bugs 270321 and 270326? I installed two
PReP systems in the last few days, and put the root filesystem on
/dev/sda3. After that, both booting with root=/dev/sda3 and with no
root option at all worked. Therefore, I am inclined to change the
option from sda2 to sda3
20 matches
Mail list logo
