Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 07:50:59PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 02:32:12PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>> > There are two or so possibilities to do that:
>> > - Build them in the i386 build. This will raise the count of imag
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 07:50:59PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 02:32:12PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > There are two or so possibilities to do that:
> > - Build them in the i386 build. This will raise the count of image by 4
> > with 2.6.17.
> If we implemented sm
Hello,
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 02:32:12PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> There are two or so possibilities to do that:
> - Build them in the i386 build. This will raise the count of image by 4
> with 2.6.17.
If we implemented smp-alternatives with 2.6.17, we could drop the UP
flavours and add am
Hi folks
I regulary get requests for amd64 kernel for debian i386. I decided to
not do that yet.
There are two or so possibilities to do that:
- Build them in the i386 build. This will raise the count of image by 4
with 2.6.17.
- Repackage the amd64 packages. This produces only network load.
B
4 matches
Mail list logo
