Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:07:34 +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
>
>> And in 2.6.31-rc6, KMS is not stable enought to be used for my day-to-day
>> work. It even leads to data corruption. See #545517
>> Since I remove KMS (ie since my bug report), I had no problem at all
>> (w
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:07:34 +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> And in 2.6.31-rc6, KMS is not stable enought to be used for my day-to-day
> work. It even leads to data corruption. See #545517
> Since I remove KMS (ie since my bug report), I had no problem at all
> (with many many suspend-resume c
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:07:34AM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >> One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with
> >> their Q4 2009 release (meaning December this year, so probably
Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with
>> their Q4 2009 release (meaning December this year, so probably something
>> we'll want for squeeze, depending on the freeze date you pic
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 18:05 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> [ Remove -release, this is technical stuff. ]
>
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 01:31:36PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:36:58 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > Is KMS backward compatible with older versions of the i
[ Remove -release, this is technical stuff. ]
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 01:31:36PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:36:58 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > Is KMS backward compatible with older versions of the intel driver?
> No :/
What happens when a old driver runs on a KMS
Le mercredi 09 septembre 2009 à 14:04 +0200, Andreas Barth a écrit :
> If not at X side, is it a possibility to either (a) add the new memory
> manager to lenny (I assume not), or (b) tell the users "you need to
> upgrade your kernel first" (and make the new X pre-depending somehow
> on the kernel
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 13:31 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:36:58 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with
> > > their Q4 2009 release (mea
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 14:42:52 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 13:31 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:36:58 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > >
* Bastian Blank (wa...@debian.org) [090909 12:37]:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with
> > their Q4 2009 release (meaning December this year, so probably something
> > we'll want for squeeze, dep
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:36:58 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with
> > their Q4 2009 release (meaning December this year, so probably something
> > we'll want for s
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with
> their Q4 2009 release (meaning December this year, so probably something
> we'll want for squeeze, depending on the freeze date you pick).
Oh, no. Not again. It
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 14:41:24 +0200, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
> * How many "big" transitions will the upcoming changes cause? When
> should those happen? Can we do something to make them easier?
>
One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with
their Q4 2009 release (mean
13 matches
Mail list logo
