Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.5)

2012-05-04 Thread dann frazier
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 11:14:38PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 10:09 -0600, dann frazier wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 04:15:31AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 16:36 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > > Is the new version ready for upload?

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.5)

2012-05-03 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 10:09 -0600, dann frazier wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 04:15:31AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 16:36 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > Is the new version ready for upload? It's looking like the point > > > release will be the 12/13th, so it woul

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.5)

2012-04-30 Thread dann frazier
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 04:15:31AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 16:36 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 05:00 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > I think we're going to need to do another kernel upload before the point > > > release to revert a fix that is

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.5)

2012-04-29 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 16:36 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 05:00 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > I think we're going to need to do another kernel upload before the point > > release to revert a fix that is worse than the original bug: > > > > > Subject: Revert "autofs: work

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.5)

2012-04-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 21:06 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > 6.0.5 is somewhat overdue now and I've been procrastinating over > organising it for a while. So before I find something else to distract > myself with, some suggested dates: It looks like the discussion has converged towards: > May 12/

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.5)

2012-04-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 05:00 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > I think we're going to need to do another kernel upload before the point > release to revert a fix that is worse than the original bug: > > > Subject: Revert "autofs: work around unhappy compat problem on x86-64" > > > > This reverts commi

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.5)

2012-04-26 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:22:18PM +0100, Mark Hymers wrote: >On Wed, 25, Apr, 2012 at 09:32:51PM +0100, Steve McIntyre spoke thus.. >> That will help, but then the issue is more a problem with downloading >> the images. I've got a full mirror at home, which helps immensely with >> jigdo downloads.

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.5)

2012-04-26 Thread Mark Hymers
On Wed, 25, Apr, 2012 at 09:32:51PM +0100, Steve McIntyre spoke thus.. > That will help, but then the issue is more a problem with downloading > the images. I've got a full mirror at home, which helps immensely with > jigdo downloads. I can try and arrange to have a full local mirror at the BSP wh

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.5)

2012-04-25 Thread Ben Hutchings
I think we're going to need to do another kernel upload before the point release to revert a fix that is worse than the original bug: > Subject: Revert "autofs: work around unhappy compat problem on x86-64" > > This reverts commit 82e43e2a64739caf323ac98641e1250c3808c300 > (commit a32744d4abae245

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.5)

2012-04-25 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 09:22:12PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 09:06:01PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote: > >May 12/13: York BSP. Probably not the best time for CDs, given that > >Steve would be at the wrong end of the country. (As will I, but that's > >less of an issue) >

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.5)

2012-04-25 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 09:25:17PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 09:22:12PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 09:06:01PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote: >> >May 12/13: York BSP. Probably not the best time for CDs, given that >> >Steve would be at the wr

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.5)

2012-04-24 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 09:06:01PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote: >Hi, > >6.0.5 is somewhat overdue now and I've been procrastinating over >organising it for a while. So before I find something else to distract >myself with, some suggested dates: > >May 5/6: Probably doable; would mean we need to clos

Squeeze point release (6.0.5)

2012-04-24 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, 6.0.5 is somewhat overdue now and I've been procrastinating over organising it for a while. So before I find something else to distract myself with, some suggested dates: May 5/6: Probably doable; would mean we need to close p-u-NEW over the coming weekend. May 12/13: York BSP. Probably no