Re: Schedule for linux-2.6 2.6.18-4

heya, On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 04:13:22PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote: > > We have an urgent fix for ppc pending, thus I would like to upload ASAP > with what we have now, and make another upload when the other stuff is > done. > > Read: we do an urgency=high upload of 2.6.18 today, if this is

Re: Schedule for linux-2.6 2.6.18-4

On Wednesday 01 November 2006 19:28, Frederik Schueler wrote: > On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 07:23:04PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > > urgency=high is bogus as that only affects migration to testing and > > would only be needed if 2.6.18 were already in testing. > > OK. What do you think about another 2.6.

Re: Schedule for linux-2.6 2.6.18-4

Hello, On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 07:23:04PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > urgency=high is bogus as that only affects migration to testing and would > only be needed if 2.6.18 were already in testing. OK. What do you think about another 2.6.17 release through t-p-u then, to fix the ppc issue in testing

Re: Schedule for linux-2.6 2.6.18-4

On Wednesday 01 November 2006 16:13, Frederik Schueler wrote: > Read: we do an urgency=high upload of 2.6.18 today, if this is ok for > everyone... comments? urgency=high is bogus as that only affects migration to testing and would only be needed if 2.6.18 were already in testing. Personally I'd

Re: Schedule for linux-2.6 2.6.18-4

On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 05:41:02PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote: > Hello Jurij, > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 07:35:49AM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote: > > I have one important fix in the pipe (boot failure on SunBlade1000). A > > patch for it was posted recently, and I've just received a > > confir

Re: Schedule for linux-2.6 2.6.18-4

Hello Jurij, On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 07:35:49AM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote: > I have one important fix in the pipe (boot failure on SunBlade1000). A > patch for it was posted recently, and I've just received a > confirmation that it fixes the problem. I'll build a test kernel > tonight and make

Re: Schedule for linux-2.6 2.6.18-4

* Frederik Schueler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-01 16:13]: > Read: we do an urgency=high upload of 2.6.18 today, if this is ok for > everyone... comments? I made some changes to ARM but they're all tested so it's fine with me. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai

Re: Schedule for linux-2.6 2.6.18-4

Hello, We have an urgent fix for ppc pending, thus I would like to upload ASAP with what we have now, and make another upload when the other stuff is done. Read: we do an urgency=high upload of 2.6.18 today, if this is ok for everyone... comments? Best regards Frederik Schueler -- ENOSIG si

Re: Schedule for linux-2.6 2.6.18-4

On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 12:17:10AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Then try that and make sure the hypervisor has no 32/64 bit > problems. Hypervisor/kernel/tools must match register size, the other parts of the userspace not. Bastian -- It is a human characteristic to love little animals,

Re: Schedule for linux-2.6 2.6.18-4 -- status report on RC bugs.

Hi, ... I just had a look at the 10 RC bugs we have open for linux-2.6, here it is : - 4 bugs are for firmware and doc non-freeness or whatever. - 392818: ext3 corruption issue in 2.6.18 found by RedHat Maks you commented on it last, any information about a fix ? - 393451: linux-image

Re: Schedule for linux-2.6 2.6.18-4

Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I think xen or vserver are the perfect environment to have both worlds >> live on the same machine. :) > > Then try that and make sure the hypervisor has no 32/64 bit > problems. I use mixed environment on the company server. We have 32 and 64 b

Re: Schedule for linux-2.6 2.6.18-4

Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061031 17:31]: >> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> Can we also have amd64-kernels again on i386? >> >> >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Andi >> > >>

Re: Schedule for linux-2.6 2.6.18-4

On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 05:26:28PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:13:33PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > >> So what if it takes a bit longer and takes a bit more disk space? Try > >> building on m68k. :) > > > >

Re: Schedule for linux-2.6 2.6.18-4

* Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061031 17:31]: > Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Can we also have amd64-kernels again on i386? > >> > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Andi > > > > The patch is in the BTS and quite small. About 5 li

Re: Schedule for linux-2.6 2.6.18-4

On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 05:30:57PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Can we also have amd64-kernels again on i386? > >> > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Andi > > > > The patch is in the BTS and quite sma

Re: Schedule for linux-2.6 2.6.18-4

Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:13:33PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> So what if it takes a bit longer and takes a bit more disk space? Try >> building on m68k. :) > > Ask cts, it takes less. Especialy as m68k currently builds only two > images. > > B

Re: Schedule for linux-2.6 2.6.18-4

On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 04:29:21PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote: > I personally have somewhat lost the overview on on open issues being > busy with RL work the past 2 weeks, so I would like everyone of you to > compile a short list of things you have on your agenda for 2.6.18-4, > and generally

Re: Schedule for linux-2.6 2.6.18-4

Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Can we also have amd64-kernels again on i386? >> >> >> Cheers, >> Andi > > The patch is in the BTS and quite small. About 5 lines of code change > and the obvious ton of .config files. Replying to myse

Re: Schedule for linux-2.6 2.6.18-4

Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Frederik Schueler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061030 16:30]: >> Fellow kernel-team members, >> >> it has been a while since our last upload, and the issues are >> cumulating. We have a total of 8 RC bugs we need to take care before the >> release, and anothe

Re: Schedule for linux-2.6 2.6.18-4

On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:13:33PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > So what if it takes a bit longer and takes a bit more disk space? Try > building on m68k. :) Ask cts, it takes less. Especialy as m68k currently builds only two images. Bastian -- I have never understood the female capacity

Re: Schedule for linux-2.6 2.6.18-4

On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Frederik Schueler wrote: > - the ext3 corruption (#392818) fixed in 2.6.18.1 jan kara's patch fixes this issue that showed up on 1k bs and stress testing with fsx. i'll close the bug later. -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubsc

Re: Schedule for linux-2.6 2.6.18-4

On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 07:14:58PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote: > I think PCIID updates are fine, and important new drivers needed for > installation, like network sata scsi or ata drivers. But this is just my > opinion, we might want to find a consensus in the team on this. To aid in consensus

Re: Schedule for linux-2.6 2.6.18-4

Hello, On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 04:41:32PM +, Oleg Verych wrote: > I will not resend, please find my message to you, Frederik, for 18-3: > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Yes, driver backports are a topic too. We wanted to di

Re: Schedule for linux-2.6 2.6.18-4

On 2006-10-30, Frederik Schueler wrote: [] > I personally have somewhat lost the overview on on open issues being=20 > busy with RL work the past 2 weeks, so I would like everyone of you to > compile a short list of things you have on your agenda for 2.6.18-4,=20 > and generally before the release.

Re: Schedule for linux-2.6 2.6.18-4

On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 04:56:17PM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > * Frederik Schueler wrote: > > - alpha gcc-4.1 migration > > It seems that there's no ABI bump for -4 wanted, so no way to move > alpha to gcc-4.1, I already reverted my earlier commit. -3 broke ABI, causing the out-of-order mo

Re: Schedule for linux-2.6 2.6.18-4

On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 04:56:17PM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > * Frederik Schueler wrote: > > - alpha gcc-4.1 migration > > It seems that there's no ABI bump for -4 wanted, so no way to move > alpha to gcc-4.1, I already reverted my earlier commit. > > Norbert we already d

Re: Schedule for linux-2.6 2.6.18-4

Hey, On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 04:56:17PM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > It seems that there's no ABI bump for -4 wanted, so no way to move > alpha to gcc-4.1, I already reverted my earlier commit. We need to bump the ABI anyway because of changes in -3, and your changes where planned for this

Re: Schedule for linux-2.6 2.6.18-4

* Frederik Schueler wrote: > - alpha gcc-4.1 migration It seems that there's no ABI bump for -4 wanted, so no way to move alpha to gcc-4.1, I already reverted my earlier commit. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont

Re: Schedule for linux-2.6 2.6.18-4

* Frederik Schueler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061030 16:30]: > Fellow kernel-team members, > > it has been a while since our last upload, and the issues are > cumulating. We have a total of 8 RC bugs we need to take care before the > release, and another dozen of driver issues we should try to sort out

Schedule for linux-2.6 2.6.18-4

Fellow kernel-team members, it has been a while since our last upload, and the issues are cumulating. We have a total of 8 RC bugs we need to take care before the release, and another dozen of driver issues we should try to sort out. IMHO, the most pressing issues are: - the ext3 corruption (#39