On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 07:08:47PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> * Featureset infos needs to go into the short and long description, how?
No ideas?
Bastian
--
Where there's no emotion, there's no motive for violence.
-- Spock, "Dagger of the Mind", stardate 2715.1
--
To UNSUB
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For that matter, if someone in the project decides that they have need for a
> different kernel than the one the kernel team wants to ship (for a
> particular port, or to support older hardware, or to support a newer
> cutting-edge kernel design, or for
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 10:49:30PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> experimental might be used if we had a linux-2.7 or something while
> it's not OK for sid and Maks and Bastian agree that we're not going to
> have more the one kernel source on the distro anymore so there's no
> more need to allow
Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 02:21:18PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 02:11:48AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>>> > I object; if and when there ever is a new upstream kernel branch th
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 02:21:18PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 02:11:48AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> > I object; if and when there ever is a new upstream kernel branch that we
>> > want to track separately this would have
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 02:21:18PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 02:11:48AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I object; if and when there ever is a new upstream kernel branch that we
> > want to track separately this would have to be reverted,
> No. We never had complete sup
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 02:07:23PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 02:11:48AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I object; if and when there ever is a new upstream kernel branch that we
> > want to track separately this would have to be reverted, and in the meantime
> > i
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 02:11:48AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I object; if and when there ever is a new upstream kernel branch that we
> want to track separately this would have to be reverted,
No. We never had complete support for more than one branch. And I really
doubt that anyone wants the
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 02:11:48AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I object; if and when there ever is a new upstream kernel branch that we
> want to track separately this would have to be reverted, and in the meantime
> it would cause more confusion and work because of the need to shuffle t
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 07:08:47PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Hi folks
> * Rename linux(-[-a-z]+|)-2.6 into linux\1.
> * Drop the 2.6 version identifier from meta packages:
> Package: linux-image-686
> Provides: linux-image, linux-latest-modules-2.6.22-1-686
> Depends: linux-image-2.6.22
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, Bastian Blank wrote:
> * Rename linux(-[-a-z]+|)-2.6 into linux\1.
> * Drop the 2.6 version identifier from meta packages:
cool
thanks for picking that up :)
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Hi folks
* Rename linux(-[-a-z]+|)-2.6 into linux\1.
* Drop the 2.6 version identifier from meta packages:
Package: linux-image-686
Provides: linux-image, linux-latest-modules-2.6.22-1-686
Depends: linux-image-2.6.22-1-686
Package: linux-headers-686
Provides: linux-headers
Depends: l
12 matches
Mail list logo
