On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 11:18 +0530, sathya sai wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> Thanks for your mail.
>
> As there were two RTM_DELADDR, I am not sure on how the parsing of
> this msg would result in identifying the notification type.
In the RT-netlink API, the netmask is part of the address, and addresses
Hi Ben,
Thanks for your mail.
As there were two RTM_DELADDR, I am not sure on how the parsing of this msg
would result in identifying the notification type.
Even I could get the following ioctl command with strace when tried with
netmask,
--
ioctl(4, SIOCSIFADDR, 0xbfb3f740) = 0
ioctl(4, S
On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 09:02 +0530, sathya sai wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> Thanks for the mail.
>
> Is there any means by which I can identify if the notification is for
> IP address (or) netmask address for RTM_NEWADDR?
Changing netmask results in a deletion of the existing address and
addition of a ne
Hi Ben,
Thanks for the mail.
Is there any means by which I can identify if the notification is for IP
address (or) netmask address for RTM_NEWADDR?
Thanks and regards,
Sathya
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 3:59 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 23:40 +0530, sathya sai wrote:
> [...]
>
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 23:40 +0530, sathya sai wrote:
[...]
> But, when I reconfigure my network interface with the below ifconfig
> command, I am shocked that the above netlink program is giving me two
> notifications with RTM_NEWADDR (new address being added to an
> interface)
>
> I am not sure w
Hello Debian forum,
This is Sathya and am presently using debian etch platform as my
development.
I am using program which creates a netlink sockets and registers for a IPv4
address notifications on a interface.
#include
#incl
6 matches
Mail list logo
