Re: Proposition: latest kernel source dependency package

Hi, Goswin von Brederlow writes: > Some people want the latest 2.4 kernel, some the latest 2.6 kernel. Yes. > Both should be possible. Yes. > So kernel-tree-2.4 and kernel-tree-2.6 should be there. Not necessarily. A kernel-tree tracker package only depends on the latest version, but doesn'

Re: Proposition: latest kernel source dependency package

Jens Schmalzing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > Goswin von Brederlow writes: > >> Better would be Kernel-tree-2.6 analog to kernel-tree-2.6.6. > > I'm working on the kernel-source-2.6.7 package anyway, I'll add a > kernel-tree metapackage. kernel-tree because IMHO sticking with a > certain

Re: Proposition: latest kernel source dependency package

Hi, Goswin von Brederlow writes: > Better would be Kernel-tree-2.6 analog to kernel-tree-2.6.6. I'm working on the kernel-source-2.6.7 package anyway, I'll add a kernel-tree metapackage. kernel-tree because IMHO sticking with a certain minor version is against the spirit of a tracker package.

Re: Proposition: latest kernel source dependency package

Wouter Koolen-Wijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Dear Debian Kernel Maintainer(s), > > I think it would be nice to have an empty package called > 'kernel-source-latest' (or something similar), which always depends on > the latest Debian kernel source package. This way (nightly cron > automated

Proposition: latest kernel source dependency package

Dear Debian Kernel Maintainer(s), I think it would be nice to have an empty package called 'kernel-source-latest' (or something similar), which always depends on the latest Debian kernel source package. This way (nightly cron automated) apt-get upgrade can automatically retrieve new kernels when