Re: Processed: reassign 676001 to busybox

2012-06-08 Thread Michael Tokarev
On 08.06.2012 15:28, maximilian attems wrote: > On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 02:59:26PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: >> [Adding debian-devel@ to the Cc list] >> >> Short story (and it is short): the bug has been filed >> against initramfs-tools initially, it is about how >> /proc and /sys filesystem sh

Re: Processed: reassign 676001 to busybox

2012-06-08 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 02:59:26PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: > [Adding debian-devel@ to the Cc list] > > Short story (and it is short): the bug has been filed > against initramfs-tools initially, it is about how > /proc and /sys filesystem should be handled in initramfs > when switching to new

Re: Processed: reassign 676001 to busybox

2012-06-08 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 03:10:42PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: > On 08.06.2012 14:52, maximilian attems wrote: > > dude care to have a bit of patience before reassigning back, > > that be really nice. > > I gave a few days, maybe it was too few, I dunno. > > > On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 08:45:59AM

Re: Processed: reassign 676001 to busybox

2012-06-08 Thread Michael Tokarev
On 08.06.2012 14:52, maximilian attems wrote: > dude care to have a bit of patience before reassigning back, > that be really nice. I gave a few days, maybe it was too few, I dunno. > On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 08:45:59AM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: [] >> I disagree it is a busybox problem, and do

Re: Processed: reassign 676001 to busybox

2012-06-08 Thread Michael Tokarev
On 08.06.2012 14:59, Michael Tokarev wrote: [] > Wonderful. > > I asked you nicely a) to stop reassigning without explanation, > and b) to provide some comments about why do you think it is > a busybox isue, at the same time providing my reasoning why > it is not. Ok. This was premature. Someho

Re: Processed: reassign 676001 to busybox

2012-06-08 Thread Michael Tokarev
[Adding debian-devel@ to the Cc list] Short story (and it is short): the bug has been filed against initramfs-tools initially, it is about how /proc and /sys filesystem should be handled in initramfs when switching to new root. Original reporter included a trivial patch for initramfs that does re

Re: Processed: reassign 676001 to busybox

2012-06-08 Thread maximilian attems
dude care to have a bit of patience before reassigning back, that be really nice. On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 08:45:59AM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: > On 05.06.2012 00:45, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > > > >> reassign 676001 busybox > > Bug

Processed: reassign 676001 to busybox

2012-06-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 676001 busybox Bug #676001 [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools: busybox's switch_root doesn't handle /proc or /sys moving Bug reassigned from package 'initramfs-tools' to 'busybox'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #676001 t

Re: Processed: reassign 676001 to busybox

2012-06-04 Thread Michael Tokarev
On 05.06.2012 00:45, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > >> reassign 676001 busybox > Bug #676001 [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools: busybox's switch_root doesn't > handle /proc or /sys moving > Bug reassigned from package 'initramfs-tools' to 'b

Processed: reassign 676001 to busybox

2012-06-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 676001 busybox Bug #676001 [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools: busybox's switch_root doesn't handle /proc or /sys moving Bug reassigned from package 'initramfs-tools' to 'busybox'. No longer marked as found in versions initramfs-tools/0.1