Re: Processed: reassign 633535 to systemtap

2011-08-10 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Hi Frank and Ritesh, >> The last module unloaded was generated by SystemTap. > There is much more information needed from the submitter, regardless. I didn't get your email. Please remember to Cc: 633535-submit...@bugs.debian.org or the emails won't reach the submitter of the bug. > - What was

Re: Processed: reassign 633535 to systemtap

2011-07-11 Thread Frank Ch. Eigler
Hi, Ben - > > > > reassign 633535 systemtap > > > Bug reassigned from package 'linux-2.6' to 'systemtap'. > > > > Can you elaborate why you believe systemtap is related? According to > > the dmesg, the last systemtap invocation was several hours before the > > kernel error. > > The last module

Re: Processed: reassign 633535 to systemtap

2011-07-11 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:14:19AM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > Hi - > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 01:33:40PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > > reassign 633535 systemtap > > Bug #633535 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: oops in > > xdr_decode_hyper+0x0/0xe [nfs] > > Bug reass

Re: Processed: reassign 633535 to systemtap

2011-07-11 Thread Frank Ch. Eigler
Hi - On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 01:33:40PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > reassign 633535 systemtap > Bug #633535 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: oops in > xdr_decode_hyper+0x0/0xe [nfs] > Bug reassigned from package 'linux-2.6' to 'systemtap'. Can you elaborate why you believ

Processed: reassign 633535 to systemtap

2011-07-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Oops indicates use of SystemTap > reassign 633535 systemtap Bug #633535 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: oops in xdr_decode_hyper+0x0/0xe [nfs] Bug reassigned from package 'linux-2.6' to 'systemtap'. Bug No longer marked as found in vers