Re: Processed: info that it has *not* been dealt with

2008-05-17 Thread Robert Millan
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:33:03AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > But the maintainer does, and for a change this request doesn't conflict with > > the Social Contract. Why are we discussing on whether we prefer one bug or > > multiple bugs when we have actual SC violations right now that need

Re: Processed: info that it has *not* been dealt with

2008-05-17 Thread Robert Millan
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 09:13:34AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:30:58AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > > On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:03:39AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > > > On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 08:31:40PM +0300, Markus Laire wrote: > > > > > > > > I'm not a maintainer,

Re: Processed: info that it has *not* been dealt with

2008-05-16 Thread Robert Millan
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:03:39AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 08:31:40PM +0300, Markus Laire wrote: > > > > I'm not a maintainer, but I did have info that bug had not been > > dealt with, so I reopened the bug with that info. > > I see that you sent info, but only to th

Re: Processed: info that it has *not* been dealt with

2008-05-16 Thread Robert Millan
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 08:31:40PM +0300, Markus Laire wrote: > > I'm not a maintainer, but I did have info that bug had not been > dealt with, so I reopened the bug with that info. I see that you sent info, but only to the BTS control bot, which prevents it from being reflected in the bug log.

Re: Processed: info that it has *not* been dealt with

2008-05-16 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 06:55:56PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > stop this game or i get you blacklisted on debian bug tracking system. > it is up to the maintainer to decide if that is closed or not. The maintainer is the Debian kernel team, not you personally. I object to you attempting to

Re: Processed: info that it has *not* been dealt with

2008-05-16 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 04:39:58PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > found 242866 2.6.24-6 > Bug#242866: drivers containing firmware blobs > Bug#243022: ymfpci_image.h: Sourceless microcode without permission to > redistribute > Bug#383403

Processed: info that it has *not* been dealt with

2008-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 242866 2.6.24-6 Bug#242866: drivers containing firmware blobs Bug#243022: ymfpci_image.h: Sourceless microcode without permission to redistribute Bug#383403: linux-2.6: includes nondistributable and non-free binary firmware Bug#412950: linux-2.6: