Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#227386: libc6-dev: ENOTSUP==EOPNOTSUPP, which violates SUSv3

2006-02-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 353516 Bug#353516: linux-2.6: ENOTSUP and EOPNOTSUPP should be different Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks, control, and have a nice day Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking syste

Bug#353516: Processed: Re: Bug#227386: libc6-dev: ENOTSUP==EOPNOTSUPP, which violates SUSv3

2006-02-19 Thread Brian M. Carlson
reopen 353516 thanks, control, and have a nice day On Sun, 2006-02-19 at 14:53 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > bits/errno.h says: Linux has no ENOTSUP error code. > and linux themself don't specify this. I understand that. However, SUSv3 requires that it exist[0]: The header shall provide a de

Processed: Re: Bug#227386: libc6-dev: ENOTSUP==EOPNOTSUPP, which violates SUSv3

2006-02-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 227386 important Bug#227386: libc6-dev: ENOTSUP==EOPNOTSUPP, which violates SUSv3 Severity set to `important'. > clone 227386 -1 Bug#227386: libc6-dev: ENOTSUP==EOPNOTSUPP, which violates SUSv3 Bug 227386 cloned as bug 353516. > reassign -1 l