On Sun, 2004-05-30 at 22:36, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 01:11:30PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > As for 3 this is a general problem of scsi disks. Wouldn't it be
> > possible for the code that scans partitions to allocate device nodes
> > dynamically for partitions
Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 05:37:05PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > No, theres lots of code in kernelspace that assumes a partitioned disk
>> > has a block of minors. Use a volume manager instead
On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 05:37:05PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > No, theres lots of code in kernelspace that assumes a partitioned disk
> > has a block of minors. Use a volume manager instead of traditional
> > partitions if you need more th
Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 01:11:30PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> As for 3 this is a general problem of scsi disks. Wouldn't it be
>> possible for the code that scans partitions to allocate device nodes
>> dynamically for partitions >15 so tha
On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 01:11:30PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> As for 3 this is a general problem of scsi disks. Wouldn't it be
> possible for the code that scans partitions to allocate device nodes
> dynamically for partitions >15 so that users with devfs or udev active
> would get additi
Hi,
recently we (debian-amd64) have gotten some problem reports for SATA.
Depending on the kernel version, how it is configured and how the
initrd is build an SATA disk shows up as /dev/hde or /dev/sda.
This has three consequences:
1. going back and forth between an old and new kernel means chan
6 matches
Mail list logo
