On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 03:10:36PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 03:09:09PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Ah, thanks for mentioning it, i will forward this info to Nicolas DET,
> > but he will probably not have time to review this before next week, nor
> > will i. The in
On Wed, 2004-06-23 at 11:34, Sven Luther wrote:
> I am a bit sick of this tyranic rule on the powerpc package you are
> taking, not really caring about non pmac packages, and arbitrarily
> taking functionality away without consulting. And please step a bit down
> from this 'i am always right' atti
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 04:52:35PM -0500, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-06-23 at 11:34, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > I am a bit sick of this tyranic rule on the powerpc package you are
> > taking, not really caring about non pmac packages, and arbitrarily
> > taking functionality away w
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 04:27:08PM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Christoph Hellwig writes:
>
> > On the junkjard.
>
> Done.
Hey, please, i protest. Why you remove the patch like that without even
consulting me about this ? It is a patch which is well tested on the
pegasos, and is even
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 04:27:08PM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> > Andrew Morton's -mm tree has a much better driver for the same
> > hardware (and it's about a third the size)
>
> This should definitely go into kernel-source then. First because it's
> already in -mm, second because it's a chan
Hi,
Christoph Hellwig writes:
> On the junkjard.
Done.
> Andrew Morton's -mm tree has a much better driver for the same
> hardware (and it's about a third the size)
This should definitely go into kernel-source then. First because it's
already in -mm, second because it's a chance of getting ou
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 03:10:36PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 03:09:09PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Ah, thanks for mentioning it, i will forward this info to Nicolas DET,
> > but he will probably not have time to review this before next week, nor
> > will i. The in
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 03:09:09PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Ah, thanks for mentioning it, i will forward this info to Nicolas DET,
> but he will probably not have time to review this before next week, nor
> will i. The included driver has some improvement to make use of the
> northbridge builtin
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 02:48:42PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 01:43:06PM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> > > i added [..] the marvell driver to the svn repo,
> >
> > Time for a subject change. We are talking about the following patch:
> >
> > http://www.theorie.phy
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 01:43:06PM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> > i added [..] the marvell driver to the svn repo,
>
> Time for a subject change. We are talking about the following patch:
>
> http://www.theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~jens/kernel-patch-powe
> rpc/kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.7-2.
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 01:43:06PM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sven Luther writes:
>
> > i added [..] the marvell driver to the svn repo,
>
> Time for a subject change. We are talking about the following patch:
>
> http://www.theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~jens/kernel-patch-powe
>
Hi,
Sven Luther writes:
> i added [..] the marvell driver to the svn repo,
Time for a subject change. We are talking about the following patch:
http://www.theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~jens/kernel-patch-powe
rpc/kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.7-2.6.7/patches/marvell-gigabit.diff>
Could someone pl
12 matches
Mail list logo
