On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 12:19 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2012-03-02 05:11:58 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > I'm therefore intending to warn about this with the following NEWS
> > entry in the linux-image metapackages:
> >
> > Index: debian/linux-image.NEWS
> > =
Hi,
On 2012-03-02 05:11:58 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I'm therefore intending to warn about this with the following NEWS
> entry in the linux-image metapackages:
>
> Index: debian/linux-image.NEWS
> ===
> --- debian/linux-image.NE
Ben Hutchings writes:
>> On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 05:11:58AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> > The longstanding link restriction patches were recently accepted by
>> > Andrew Morton and are likely to end up in Linux 3.4. I've applied
>> > these to src:linux-2.6 in svn and they should end up in the
On 02.03.2012 10:47, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Freitag, 2. März 2012, Kees Cook wrote:
> + * The new kernel version includes security restrictions on
links,
> +These restrictions may cause some legitimate programs to
fail.
> +In particular, if the 'at' package is installed, you should
e
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 07:43 +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 05:11:58AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > + * The new kernel version includes security restrictions on links, which
> > +are enabled by default. These are specified in
> > +Documentation/sysctl/fs.txt in t
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 21:40 -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 05:11:58AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > The longstanding link restriction patches were recently accepted by
> > Andrew Morton and are likely to end up in Linux 3.4. I've applied
> > these to src:linux-2.6 in svn and t
On Fri, 02 Mar 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> We know that these are going to break some programs, most notably
> 'at' (#597130, fixed in wheezy/sid). But of course it's possible
Please consider pushing for a stable update of "at" to address this. It is
extremely common to run Debian stable usersp
Hi,
On Freitag, 2. März 2012, Kees Cook wrote:
> > + * The new kernel version includes security restrictions on links,
> > +These restrictions may cause some legitimate programs to fail.
> > +In particular, if the 'at' package is installed, you should either:
> > +- Upgrade it to at l
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 05:11:58AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> + * The new kernel version includes security restrictions on links, which
> +are enabled by default. These are specified in
> +Documentation/sysctl/fs.txt in the linux-doc-3.2 and linux-source-3.2
> +packages.
It'd be h
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 05:11:58AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> The longstanding link restriction patches were recently accepted by
> Andrew Morton and are likely to end up in Linux 3.4. I've applied
> these to src:linux-2.6 in svn and they should end up in the upcoming
> version 3.2.9-1.
That's
On 12-03-02 at 05:11am, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> The longstanding link restriction patches were recently accepted by
> Andrew Morton and are likely to end up in Linux 3.4. I've applied
> these to src:linux-2.6 in svn and they should end up in the upcoming
> version 3.2.9-1.
>
> We know that these a
The longstanding link restriction patches were recently accepted by
Andrew Morton and are likely to end up in Linux 3.4. I've applied
these to src:linux-2.6 in svn and they should end up in the upcoming
version 3.2.9-1.
We know that these are going to break some programs, most notably
'at' (#5971
12 matches
Mail list logo
