On Sat, 07 May 2005 19:55:39 -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
wrote:
[...]
>
> And another idea, dilinger could upload the packages
> to people.d.o, it can avoid the problem of uncertain about
> his Debian membership.
>
Yes, I should probably do that. As I'm in the process of movi
On Sat, 07 May 2005, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > "# work around idiocy in recent kernel versions" i find that output
> > quite wierd. localversion was meant for distributions and is much
> > easier to use than to change EXTRAVERSION in the Makefile.
>
> You are just displaying your ignora
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 10:58:56AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Fri, 6 May 2005 09:15:29 +1000, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > Could you please elaborate? I personally think it is pretty damn
> > hard for kernel-package to cope with all situations, and that in
> > many ways the ker
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 07:55:39PM -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Horms wrote:
> :: On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 08:42:07PM +0200, Marco Calviani wrote:
> maximilian attems wrote:
> :: dilinger is member of the debian kerne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Horms wrote:
:: On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 08:42:07PM +0200, Marco Calviani wrote:
maximilian attems wrote:
:: dilinger is member of the debian kernel team.
:: if you'd not trust him, you'd better watch his commits?
You're right i'm que
On Sat, 7 May 2005 11:36:08 +0200, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sat, 07 May 2005, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Fri, 6 May 2005 18:11:27 +0200, maximilian attems
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
snipp>
>> > the strings out of kernel-package are sometimes quite offensive.
>>
>> A
On Sat, 07 May 2005, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Fri, 6 May 2005 18:11:27 +0200, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> > the strings out of kernel-package are sometimes quite offensive.
>
> Ah. Drive by criticism.
no picking up the subject for discussions.
"# work around id
On Fri, 6 May 2005 18:11:27 +0200, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Fri, 06 May 2005, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Fri, 6 May 2005 09:15:29 +1000, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>> Well, on IRC I was informed that kernel-package sucked, that the
>> kernel team spent lots of
On Fri, 06 May 2005, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Fri, 6 May 2005 09:15:29 +1000, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> Well, on IRC I was informed that kernel-package sucked, that
> the kernel team spent lots of times working around bugs and missing
> functionality in kernel-package.
On Fri, 6 May 2005 09:15:29 +1000, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Could you please elaborate? I personally think it is pretty damn
> hard for kernel-package to cope with all situations, and that in
> many ways the kernel packates updloaded to d.o are not the general
> case, so yes we make som
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 02:05:18PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 02:01:02PM +0200, Marco Calviani wrote:
> > sorry for the maybe stupid and repetitive question, is it possible to
> > use the nice features of make-kpkg also with a vanilla kernel coming
> > from kern
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 08:42:07PM +0200, Marco Calviani wrote:
> maximilian attems wrote:
>
> >dilinger is member of the debian kernel team.
> >if you'd not trust him, you'd better watch his commits?
> >
> >
> >--
> >maks
> >
> >
> You're right i'm questioning this, since i've also written to hi
maximilian attems wrote:
dilinger is member of the debian kernel team.
if you'd not trust him, you'd better watch his commits?
--
maks
You're right i'm questioning this, since i've also written to him about
this, he's nice and friendly! No, my question was something in
principle: are we going
maximilian attems wrote:
dilinger is member of the debian kernel team.
if you'd not trust him, you'd better watch his commits?
--
maks
You're right i'm questioning this, since i've also written to him about
this, he's nice and friendly! No, my question was something in
principle: are we going
On Wed, 04 May 2005, Marco Calviani wrote:
> maximilian attems ha scritto:
>
> >
> >if you looked at bit in the archive you should have stumbled on that link:
> >-> http://www.acm.cs.rpi.edu/~dilinger/kernel-source-nonfree-2.6.11/
> >
> >--
> >maks
> >
> >
> >
> >
> Hi,
> you've got the point.
maximilian attems ha scritto:
if you looked at bit in the archive you should have stumbled on that link:
-> http://www.acm.cs.rpi.edu/~dilinger/kernel-source-nonfree-2.6.11/
--
maks
Hi,
you've got the point. I can use it, of course, but it is not on an
official debian server. Does it means th
On Wed, 04 May 2005, Marco Calviani wrote:
> Marc Haber ha scritto:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 02:01:02PM +0200, Marco Calviani wrote:
> >
> >
> >> sorry for the maybe stupid and repetitive question, is it possible to
> >>use the nice features of make-kpkg also with a vanilla kerne
Marc Haber ha scritto:
Hi,
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 02:01:02PM +0200, Marco Calviani wrote:
sorry for the maybe stupid and repetitive question, is it possible to
use the nice features of make-kpkg also with a vanilla kernel coming
from kernel.org or is it required to use the kernel-source from
Marc Haber ha scritto:
Hi,
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 02:01:02PM +0200, Marco Calviani wrote:
sorry for the maybe stupid and repetitive question, is it possible to
use the nice features of make-kpkg also with a vanilla kernel coming
from kernel.org or is it required to use the kernel-source from
Hi,
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 02:01:02PM +0200, Marco Calviani wrote:
> sorry for the maybe stupid and repetitive question, is it possible to
> use the nice features of make-kpkg also with a vanilla kernel coming
> from kernel.org or is it required to use the kernel-source from debian
> reposit
Hi,
sorry for the maybe stupid and repetitive question, is it possible to
use the nice features of make-kpkg also with a vanilla kernel coming
from kernel.org or is it required to use the kernel-source from debian
repositories?
Thanks again,
MC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
21 matches
Mail list logo
