Processed: Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k causes lockups since kernel 2.6.35

2011-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 611946 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37462 Bug #611946 [linux-2.6] linux-2.6: 2.6.33 introduced lockups with ath9k Changed Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37462' from 'http://threa

Re: Kernel 2.6.35

2010-09-21 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 03:40 -0400, Ariel wrote: > On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 16:56 -0400, Ariel wrote: > > >> For the ASUS P7P55D-E Pro motherboard, which uses the VIA vt1828s, > >> surround sound only gained support with ALSA 1.0.22 but 2.6.32 has 1.0.21

Re: Kernel 2.6.35

2010-09-21 Thread Ariel
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 16:56 -0400, Ariel wrote: For the ASUS P7P55D-E Pro motherboard, which uses the VIA vt1828s, surround sound only gained support with ALSA 1.0.22 but 2.6.32 has 1.0.21. I've now backported all the changes to support new VIA cod

Re: Kernel 2.6.35

2010-09-05 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 16:56 -0400, Ariel wrote: > On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > We don't expect you to do that. Just tell us what's missing. > > For the ASUS P7P55D-E Pro motherboard, which uses the VIA vt1828s, > surround sound only gained support with ALSA 1.0.22 but 2.6.32

Re: Kernel 2.6.35

2010-08-20 Thread Vincent Danjean
On 19/08/2010 01:54, Jeff Carr wrote: > Could you make the 2.6.35 package available in only sid? If as soon as > you put it in sid, it automagically tries to build it for testing and > stable -- then I could see how that would be a problem. In that case, > the proper thing to do might be to figure

Re: Kernel 2.6.35

2010-08-18 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 16:54 -0700, Jeff Carr wrote: > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 20:26, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > The kernel team (in conjunction with the security team) decided that one > > kernel per release is less trouble. > > Is there information available anywhere about this? (Maybe some > t

Re: Kernel 2.6.35

2010-08-18 Thread Jeff Carr
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 20:26, Ben Hutchings wrote: > The kernel team (in conjunction with the security team) decided that one > kernel per release is less trouble. Is there information available anywhere about this? (Maybe some thoughts on things of this nature could be added to the debian kern

Bug#568367: doesn't work with kernel 2.6.35 from experimental

2010-08-17 Thread Moritz Strohm
Hi, I tried kernel 2.6.35 from experimental. Exact kernel version: Linux 2.6.35-trunk-686 #1 SMP Tue Aug 17 14:30:48 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux Dmesg output: (some messages concerning my DVD drive also appear every time the stick was detected) [ 387.284099] usb 4-1: new full speed USB device

Re: Kernel 2.6.35

2010-08-14 Thread Vincent Danjean
Hi, On 12/08/2010 22:56, Ariel wrote: > For the ASUS P7P55D-E Pro motherboard, which uses the VIA vt1828s, > surround sound only gained support with ALSA 1.0.22 but 2.6.32 has 1.0.21. > > I suppose I could use alsa-source to get the modules, but I prefer to > compile it into the kernel. > > Al

Re: Kernel 2.6.35

2010-08-12 Thread Ariel
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote: We don't expect you to do that. Just tell us what's missing. For the ASUS P7P55D-E Pro motherboard, which uses the VIA vt1828s, surround sound only gained support with ALSA 1.0.22 but 2.6.32 has 1.0.21. I suppose I could use alsa-source to get the

Re: Kernel 2.6.35

2010-08-11 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 19:39 -0700, Jeff Carr wrote: > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 19:21, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > Why is that necessary when they are available in experimental? > > It's a problem for me because I deal with lots of people that I can't > explain that too. > > > Bear in mind that we

Re: Kernel 2.6.35

2010-08-11 Thread Jeff Carr
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 19:21, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Why is that necessary when they are available in experimental? It's a problem for me because I deal with lots of people that I can't explain that too. > Bear in mind that we do not want to have multiple kernel versions in one > release, as t

Re: Kernel 2.6.35

2010-08-10 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 19:06 -0700, Jeff Carr wrote: > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 05:48, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > Once squeeze is released we'll upload the latest kernel to unstable, > > whether that's 2.6.35 or .36. > > It would be helpful to me if there was a way to make newer kernels > availabl

Re: Kernel 2.6.35

2010-08-10 Thread Jeff Carr
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 05:48, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Once squeeze is released we'll upload the latest kernel to unstable, > whether that's 2.6.35 or .36. It would be helpful to me if there was a way to make newer kernels available in sid. Is there anything we could do to help? I seem to remembe

Re: Kernel 2.6.35

2010-08-10 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 10:32 +0200, Berillions wrote: > Hello, > > i saw that the latest kernel (2.6.35) is in the branch Experimental > and her version is *-trunk. > I would like to know if it's possible to have a date of release in Sid > for this kernel version. Packages

Kernel 2.6.35

2010-08-10 Thread Berillions
Hello, i saw that the latest kernel (2.6.35) is in the branch Experimental and her version is *-trunk. I would like to know if it's possible to have a date of release in Sid for this kernel version. Thanks Berillions,