Re: Kernel 2.6.19

2007-02-16 Thread Otavio Salvador
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 10:14:10AM +0100, Matthias Popp wrote: >>>> Hallo, >>&g

Re: Kernel 2.6.19

2007-02-15 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 10:14:10AM +0100, Matthias Popp wrote: >>> Hallo, >>> >>> Why is kernel 2.6.19 removed from here ? >>> >>

Re: Kernel 2.6.19

2007-02-08 Thread maximilian attems
[ not private question so you'd better ask on mailinglist ] On Fri, 02 Feb 2007, Figaro wrote: > Quick question: > How may one add this to my apt/sources.list? > Thank you, > matthew hmm, editing them. :) see the apt lines: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai

Re: Kernel 2.6.19

2007-02-03 Thread Otavio Salvador
maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 10:14:10AM +0100, Matthias Popp wrote: >> Hallo, >> >> Why is kernel 2.6.19 removed from here ? >> >> http://kernel-archive.buildserver.net/debian-kernel/pool/main/l/linux-2.6/ >

Re: Kernel 2.6.19

2007-02-02 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 10:14:10AM +0100, Matthias Popp wrote: > Hallo, > > Why is kernel 2.6.19 removed from here ? > > http://kernel-archive.buildserver.net/debian-kernel/pool/main/l/linux-2.6/ just use the 2.6.20-rc6 -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wi

Kernel 2.6.19

2007-02-01 Thread Matthias Popp
Hallo, Why is kernel 2.6.19 removed from here ? http://kernel-archive.buildserver.net/debian-kernel/pool/main/l/linux-2.6/ -- with best regards from Dortmund                                                      Matthias Popp (KBDCALLS) pgpkprD8gQF72.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#402707: marked as done (rtorrent: Hash check fails on every download with kernel 2.6.19)

2007-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:40:23 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#402707: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#402707: marked as done (rtorrent: Hash check fails on every download with kernel 2.6.19)

2007-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:40:23 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#401006: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#402707: marked as done (rtorrent: Hash check fails on every download with kernel 2.6.19)

2007-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:40:23 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#401980: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#336153: Fixed in kernel 2.6.19, patch for older kernels available

2006-12-03 Thread Tillmann Steinbrecher
apply this patch for debian kernels. It's really important due to the amount of data that can possibly be lost due to fs corruptions related to this problem. The bug is also fixed in kernel 2.6.19. All the best, Tillmann -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subje