Your message dated Wed, 12 Nov 2008 01:45:04 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#440299: linux-image-2.6.22-1-mckinley: McKinley
flavour does not inclide IDE drivers
has caused the Debian Bug report #440299,
regarding linux-image-2.6.22-1-mckinley: McKinley f
> After upgrading to 2.6.18 I am no longer able to boot the machine,
> as the IDE drivers fails to load correctly.
can we have an update on kernel with newer acpi
testing has 2.6.22 and unstable 2.6.24
are they still seeing aboves failure to need "acpi=off" bootparam?
--
Hi Dann,
Ok, cool, thanks a lot for letting me know.
Cheers,
Andree
On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 11:14 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 09:20:24PM +1000, Andree Leidenfrost wrote:
> > Package: linux-image-2.6.22-1-mckinley
> > Version: 2.6.22-3
> > Severity: normal
> >
> >
> > amd
Hi Maximilian,
Thanks a lot for your response.
I suppose Dann gave the answer by saying this will be fixed in 2.6.22-4.
And, yeah, I know yaird is deprecated. I had just tried it out to see
whether it would make a difference.
Thanks again!
Cheers,
Andree
On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 13:52 +0200, max
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 09:20:24PM +1000, Andree Leidenfrost wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.22-1-mckinley
> Version: 2.6.22-3
> Severity: normal
>
>
> amd64 is fine. Also, 2.6.18 is fine as well.
>
> There is not even a directory
>
> /lib/modules/2.6.22-1-mckinley/kernel/drivers/ide/
>
> T
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 09:20:24PM +1000, Andree Leidenfrost wrote:
>
> amd64 is fine. Also, 2.6.18 is fine as well.
>
> There is not even a directory
>
> /lib/modules/2.6.22-1-mckinley/kernel/drivers/ide/
please send in your output of
lscpi -vn
> This causes my system to fail to boot becaus
Package: linux-image-2.6.22-1-mckinley
Version: 2.6.22-3
Severity: normal
amd64 is fine. Also, 2.6.18 is fine as well.
There is not even a directory
/lib/modules/2.6.22-1-mckinley/kernel/drivers/ide/
This causes my system to fail to boot because I am booting off an IDE disk.
Cheers,
Andree
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 04:38:00AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Thursday 02 June 2005 00:46, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > The Fedora kernel binary packages have IDE compiled into the kernel,
> > > presumably to work around this problem.
> > >
> > > I guess that this ind
On Saturday 04 June 2005 01:58, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > > Frozen at <10% disk IO performance for many machines...
> > >
> > > i don't agree.
> >
> > What do you disagree about? Do you believe that the Debian kernels will
> > support DMA on all IDE devices? Do you belie
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 01:45:05PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Friday 03 June 2005 04:49, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > The Fedora kernel binary packages have IDE compiled into the kernel,
> > > > > presumably to work around this problem.
> > > > >
> > > > > I guess th
On Fri, 03 Jun 2005, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Friday 03 June 2005 04:49, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > The Fedora kernel binary packages have IDE compiled into the kernel,
> > > > > presumably to work around this problem.
> > > > >
> > > > > I guess that this indicates a
On Friday 03 June 2005 04:49, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > The Fedora kernel binary packages have IDE compiled into the kernel,
> > > > presumably to work around this problem.
> > > >
> > > > I guess that this indicates a bug in the kernel.org source. But
> > > > while we w
On Thu, 02 Jun 2005, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Thursday 02 June 2005 00:46, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > The Fedora kernel binary packages have IDE compiled into the kernel,
> > > presumably to work around this problem.
> > >
> > > I guess that this indicates a bug in the
On Thursday 02 June 2005 00:46, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > The Fedora kernel binary packages have IDE compiled into the kernel,
> > presumably to work around this problem.
> >
> > I guess that this indicates a bug in the kernel.org source. But while we
> > wait for that to b
On Tue, 31 May 2005, Russell Coker wrote:
> On a couple of machines I've found that having IDE drivers built as modules
> (as is done in the Debian kernel binary packages) will result in DMA not
> being usable and performance sucking (3MB/s maximum transfer rate). On the
> s
On a couple of machines I've found that having IDE drivers built as modules
(as is done in the Debian kernel binary packages) will result in DMA not
being usable and performance sucking (3MB/s maximum transfer rate). On the
same machine using a kernel with the IDE drivers compiled in
Machine with kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686-smp
/var/log/dmesg:
ide: late registration of driver.
SIS5513: IDE controller at PCI slot 00:02.5
SIS5513: chipset revision 0
SIS5513: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
SIS5513: SiS 962/963 MuTIOL IDE UDMA133 controller
ide0: BM-DMA at 0xffa0-0x
17 matches
Mail list logo
