* Bastian Blank [Sat, 29 Nov 2008 00:41:07 +0100]:
> not in testing btrfs-source. unstable: btrfs (0.16-3)
Disabled from l-m-e-2.6 now.
> out of date drbd8-source. drbd8 (2:8.0.13-2 -> 2:8.0.14-2)
> out of date redhat-cluster-source. redhat-cluster (2.20080801-4 ->
> 2.20081102-1)
Both unblock
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 02:03:31PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> linux-modules-*-2.6 also produces a source-availability problem, they
> use source including binary packages from unstable to build binary
> packages. In unstable this is usualy no problem as we ship the source in
> at least one varia
Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Luk Claes wrote:
>> t-p-u is not the best alternative IMHO, we're not talking about some
>> package (linux-modules-*2.6) we can easily take out of the release if it
>> breaks without harming lots of users...
>
> ack.
>
>> Either we remove virtualbox-ose from the release or
Luk Claes wrote:
> t-p-u is not the best alternative IMHO, we're not talking about some
> package (linux-modules-*2.6) we can easily take out of the release if it
> breaks without harming lots of users...
ack.
> Either we remove virtualbox-ose from the release or we accept the
> version in unstab
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 02:58:47PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Bastian Blank wrote:
>> > For a short-term fix I only see three solutions:
>> > - Continue to upload to unstable, drop virtualbox modules.
>> > - Upload to testing-proposed-updates.
>> > - Let
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 02:58:47PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>>> Bastian Blank wrote:
For a short-term fix I only see three solutions:
- Continue to upload to unstable, drop virtualbox modules.
- Upload to testing
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 02:58:47PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Bastian Blank wrote:
> > For a short-term fix I only see three solutions:
> > - Continue to upload to unstable, drop virtualbox modules.
> > - Upload to testing-proposed-updates.
> > - Let virtualbox-ose into Lenny.
> None of these look r
Bastian Blank wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> linux-modules-*-2.6 also produces a source-availability problem, they
> use source including binary packages from unstable to build binary
> packages. In unstable this is usualy no problem as we ship the source in
> at least one variant. For the packages in test
Hi folks
linux-modules-*-2.6 also produces a source-availability problem, they
use source including binary packages from unstable to build binary
packages. In unstable this is usualy no problem as we ship the source in
at least one variant. For the packages in testing this can be a problem,
escpec
9 matches
Mail list logo
