On Mon, 2023-01-09 at 17:32 -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
[...]
> Thanks again Ben! With the releases, the plan is to follow the kernel
> releases? We could potentially be more aggressive with the perf tool
> given its backward compatibility. That would benefit people using
> older kernels who want the
On Mon, Dec 26, 2022 at 11:15 AM Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2022-12-22 at 17:43 -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> [...]
> > I had a few things to ask wrt this thread and getting the best
> > possible Debian experience:
> > - in Linux 6.2 the libtraceevent will need to become an external
> > librar
On Sun, 2022-12-25 at 03:51 -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Ian Rogers writes:
>
> > So I wanted to say a BIG thanks to Ben as I see in the 5.16
> > changelog
> > that the perf wrapper script for Debian is now gone!
As already said: Thank you Ben!
> >
> > https://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/cha
On Thu, 2022-12-22 at 17:43 -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
[...]
> I had a few things to ask wrt this thread and getting the best
> possible Debian experience:
> - in Linux 6.2 the libtraceevent will need to become an external
> library dependency
This shouldn't be a problem; it's already packaged sepa
Ian Rogers writes:
> So I wanted to say a BIG thanks to Ben as I see in the 5.16 changelog
> that the perf wrapper script for Debian is now gone!
> https://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/l/linux/linux_6.1~rc8-1~exp1_changelog
Halleluja! This wrapper literally is the singlest big
So I wanted to say a BIG thanks to Ben as I see in the 5.16 changelog
that the perf wrapper script for Debian is now gone!
https://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/l/linux/linux_6.1~rc8-1~exp1_changelog
```
linux (5.16.3-1~exp1) experimental; urgency=medium
...
* linux-perf: Build
Em Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 12:54:31AM +0100, Ben Hutchings escreveu:
> On Sun, 2021-11-21 at 18:18 -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd love to package Linux perf as per Arnaldo's prepared tarball for
> > Debian. If I could get help on the Debian side it would be great! The
> > actions that a
On Fri, 2021-11-12 at 11:39 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 10:34:33PM -0800, Ian Rogers escreveu:
> > Hi,
>
> > Debian currently tries to match the Linux perf tool to the version of
> > the kernel that it is being run upon. Reaching out to Ben Hutchings,
> > he e
On Sun, 2021-11-21 at 18:18 -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd love to package Linux perf as per Arnaldo's prepared tarball for
> Debian. If I could get help on the Debian side it would be great! The
> actions that are needed are:
>
> 1) package Arnaldo's tarball for Debian, presumably the bu
: Getting the latest and greatest Linux perf features on every
> Debian
> kernel
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd love to package Linux perf as per Arnaldo's prepared tarball for Debian.
> If I
> could get help on the Debian side it would be great! The actions that are
> needed
&g
Hi,
I'd love to package Linux perf as per Arnaldo's prepared tarball for
Debian. If I could get help on the Debian side it would be great! The
actions that are needed are:
1) package Arnaldo's tarball for Debian, presumably the build in the
sources for linux-perf-5.10 will be a good starting poin
Em Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 10:34:33PM -0800, Ian Rogers escreveu:
> Hi,
> Debian currently tries to match the Linux perf tool to the version of
> the kernel that it is being run upon. Reaching out to Ben Hutchings,
> he explained to me that this was done back in 2010 due to kernel and
> Linux perf i
Hi,
Debian currently tries to match the Linux perf tool to the version of the
kernel that it is being run upon. Reaching out to Ben Hutchings, he
explained to me that this was done back in 2010 due to kernel and Linux
perf incompatibilities. This was likely the case, but it was a bug in the
Linux
13 matches
Mail list logo
