On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:56:25 +0200 maximilian attems wrote:
> also attacking svenl just because it was svenl doesn't bring anything
> forward.
Just for the record: I was not.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
-
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> You don't get out much do you? If you don't like it, set Mail-Followup-To!
> Otherwise, you're complaining about having the SENDER have to do more work?
> And *THAT* is rude.
>
> This is also contrary to virtually every other Linux related mailing list
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 09:14:55PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> You might agree, but it's against the code of conduct for the debian mailing
> lists: http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/index.html#codeofconduct
> (#9 in that list)
>
> Be liberal in what you accept, and strict in what you send!
T
Hi,
On Tuesday 27 June 2006 15:26, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> I agree with Sven. If you don't like it, either set up procmail
> so you don't receive duplicates, or set Mail-Followup-To header.
You might agree, but it's against the code of conduct for the debian mailing
lists: http://www.debian.org/M
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 16:57:42 +0200 Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 04:12:09PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 14:27:08 +0200 Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > > Bah, whatever, you know i asked for the creation of the
> > > debian-kernel mailing list, should i then cha
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 02:09:56PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Why don't you set M-F-T to the right thing like others do ?
>
I agree with Sven. If you don't like it, either set up procmail
so you don't receive duplicates, or set Mail-Followup-To header.
Anything else, and you're just bei
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 04:12:09PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 14:27:08 +0200 Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > Bah, whatever, you know i asked for the creation of the debian-kernel
> > mailing list, should i then change the code of conduct for it or
> > something such ?
>
> I was
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 14:27:08 +0200 Sven Luther wrote:
> Bah, whatever, you know i asked for the creation of the debian-kernel
> mailing list, should i then change the code of conduct for it or
> something such ?
I was unaware that you invented this list. And it really is of no
interest to me.
DO
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 02:09:56PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 13:13:11 +0200 Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 12:04:49PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 11:11:23 +0200 Sven Luther wrote:
> > >
> > > [stuff both targeted at lists a
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 13:13:11 +0200 Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 12:04:49PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 11:11:23 +0200 Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > [stuff both targeted at lists and personally]
> >
> > Please, Sven, respect the Debian code of conduct regar
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 11:11:23 +0200 Sven Luther wrote:
[stuff both targeted at lists and personally]
Please, Sven, respect the Debian code of conduct regarding
mailinglists [1]:
> When replying to messages on the mailing list, do not send a carbon
> copy (CC) to the original poster unless they ex
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 11:01:52AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 10:03:04 +0200 maximilian attems wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 09:47:32AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 09:17:49AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
>
> > > > did you check it th
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 10:03:04 +0200 maximilian attems wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 09:47:32AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 09:17:49AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > did you check it they get loaded by the initramfs?
> > > please tell which fan and i2c modules ne
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 09:47:32AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 09:17:49AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > hello svenl,
> >
> > On Sun, 25 Jun 2006, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > > I have been experimenting with 2.6.16 and 2.6.17 and builtin or modular
> > > THERM_PM72 on
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 09:17:49AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> hello svenl,
>
> On Sun, 25 Jun 2006, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > I have been experimenting with 2.6.16 and 2.6.17 and builtin or modular
> > THERM_PM72 on my XServer G5.
> >
> > The result is as follows :
> >
> > 2.6.16 + modu
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 09:17:49AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> hello svenl,
>
> On Sun, 25 Jun 2006, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > I have been experimenting with 2.6.16 and 2.6.17 and builtin or modular
> > THERM_PM72 on my XServer G5.
> >
> > The result is as follows :
> >
> > 2.6.16 + modu
hello svenl,
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006, Sven Luther wrote:
> I have been experimenting with 2.6.16 and 2.6.17 and builtin or modular
> THERM_PM72 on my XServer G5.
>
> The result is as follows :
>
> 2.6.16 + modular fan control -> airplan noise level.
> 2.6.17 + modular fan control -> still noisy
Hi all,
I have been experimenting with 2.6.16 and 2.6.17 and builtin or modular
THERM_PM72 on my XServer G5.
The result is as follows :
2.6.16 + modular fan control -> airplan noise level.
2.6.17 + modular fan control -> still noisy, but orders of magnitude lower.
2.6.17 + builtin fan cont
18 matches
Mail list logo
