On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 07:09:36PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 11:10:19PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>
> No reply?
>
> Bastian
Was there something to reply ? I didn't get the impression that you gave any
valuable reason, and "read again" is not something which i unders
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 11:10:19PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
No reply?
Bastian
--
We do not colonize. We conquer. We rule. There is no other way for us.
-- Rojan, "By Any Other Name", stardate 4657.5
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 07:12:57PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Ok, explain me why you want to have it part of the kernel subdir then, if we
> are going to empty it of any further content ?
Why exists arch and utils? Just move anything up.
> I really don't get why you are opposing this move, so ho
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 07:11:12PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 12:07:02PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Thanks, we can now go ahead and do the cleanup.
>
> The linux-2.6 move was not part of this dicision.
Ok, explain me why you want to have it part of the kernel subdir
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 12:07:02PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Thanks, we can now go ahead and do the cleanup.
The linux-2.6 move was not part of this dicision.
Bastian
--
Totally illogical, there was no chance.
-- Spock, "The Galileo Seven", stardate 2822.3
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 12:15:56PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 10:43:24AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Waldi, i would like your express comment on this, but i believe from your
> > previous comments that this should suite you.
>
> And please rename tags to releases or so
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 10:43:24AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Waldi, i would like your express comment on this, but i believe from your
> previous comments that this should suite you.
And please rename tags to releases or so. We only have release sources
in it and this makes that clear.
Bastian
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 12:06:15PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 10:43:24AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > We then can add a :
> > dists/common
> > For stuff common to all distributions, like the utils and so on, but which
> > can
> > live also under the the individual dis
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 10:43:24AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> We then can add a :
> dists/common
> For stuff common to all distributions, like the utils and so on, but which can
> live also under the the individual distribs if we need them.
We don't have anything really common. The versions bet
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 10:43:24AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 04:49:59PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > with the advent of the unified kernel package for 2.6 some of the
> > original SVN layout has become irrelevant. As a background here is
> > how things used to look
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 04:49:59PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> Hi,
>
> with the advent of the unified kernel package for 2.6 some of the
> original SVN layout has become irrelevant. As a background here is
> how things used to look.
Ok, this mess can no longer continue, since it is paralizing us all, a
11 matches
Mail list logo
