Re: Common kernel-image source package

2005-05-11 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Wed, 11 May 2005 10:21:53 -0400, Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I'd love to see the code you have so far. My plan was/is to use > cdbs2 for the common kernel image stuff (code is available here: > http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/build-common/trunk/?rev=0&sc=0). The > main goals of cd

Re: Common kernel-image source package

2005-05-11 Thread Andres Salomon
On Tue, 10 May 2005 23:59:31 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: [...] > > Tentatively, my plans are like this: > a) Break up the /usr/share/kernel-package/rules file into smaller > blocks, and move them into separate, modules like: > /usr/share/kernel-package/include/BLAH.mk > >

Re: Common kernel-image source package

2005-05-10 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Tue, 10 May 2005 19:21:04 -0400 (EDT), Jurij Smakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Tue, 10 May 2005, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Does this mean that the common kernel source package would no >> longer use make-kpkg to build the image? If not, why not >> co-ordinate with kernel-packa

Re: Common kernel-image source package

2005-05-10 Thread Jurij Smakov
On Tue, 10 May 2005, Manoj Srivastava wrote: Hi, Does this mean that the common kernel source package would no longer use make-kpkg to build the image? If not, why not co-ordinate with kernel-package to get a common mechanism of creating control and config files? kerel-package already has me

Re: Common kernel-image source package

2005-05-10 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Tue, 10 May 2005 22:54:24 +0200, Christian T Steigies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Anyhow, I like kernel-package a lot (and I use it differently than > other arches, just like I inherited it). However with some recent > version, something seems to have changed so that I can not > cross-compile

Re: Common kernel-image source package

2005-05-10 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 03:18:28PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Hi, > > Does this mean that the common kernel source package would no > longer use make-kpkg to build the image? If not, why not co-ordinate > with kernel-package to get a common mechanism of creating control and > conf

Re: Common kernel-image source package

2005-05-10 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, Does this mean that the common kernel source package would no longer use make-kpkg to build the image? If not, why not co-ordinate with kernel-package to get a common mechanism of creating control and config files? kerel-package already has mechanisms for creating the rules file, c

Common kernel-image source package

2005-05-09 Thread Jurij Smakov
Hi, I have started working on the common kernel-image package, the one which will be capable of building kernel-image for all arches and subarches. The (not so impressive so far) results are in the svn, in the directory branches/kernel-image-2.6.11. Following ideas so far (some may not be impleme